Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology

Richard J. Wakefield*, Peter V. Balint, Marcin Szkudlarek, Emilio Filippucci, Marina Backhaus, Maria Antonietta D'Agostino, Esperanza Naredo Sanchez, Annamaria Iagnocco, Wolfgang A. Schmidt, George Bruyn, David Kane, Philip J. O'Connor, Bernhard Manger, Fred Joshua, Juhani Koski, Walter Grassi, Marissa N D Lassere, Nanno Swen, Franz Kainberger, Andrea KlauserMikkel Ostergaard, Andrew K. Brown, Klaus P. Machold, Philip G. Conaghan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

982 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) has great potential as an outcome in rheumatoid arthritis trials for detecting bone erosions, synovitis, tendon disease, and enthesopathy. It has a number of distinct advantages over magnetic resonance imaging, including good patient tolerability and ability to scan multiple joints in a short period of time. However, there are scarce data regarding its validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness to change, making interpretation and comparison of studies difficult. In particular, there are limited data describing standardized scanning methodology and standardized definitions of US pathologies. This article presents the first report from the OMERACT ultrasound special interest group, which has compared US against the criteria of the OMERACT filter. Also proposed for the first time are consensus US definitions for common pathological lesions seen in patients with inflammatory arthritis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2485-2487
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Rheumatology
Volume32
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Enthesopathy
  • Erosions
  • Synovitis
  • Tenosynovitis
  • Ultrasound

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this