Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Negative sentences in children with specific language impairment

Rosalind Thornton*, Kelly Rombough, Jasmine Martin, Linda Orton

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

    Abstract

    This study used elicited production methodology to investigate the negative sentences that are produced by English-speaking children with specific language impairment (SLI). Negative sentences were elicited in contexts in which adults use the negative auxiliary verb doesn't (e.g., It doesn't fit). This form was targeted to see how negative markers (not, n't) interact with the 3rd person singular -s in the grammars of children with SLI. A robust sample of negative sentences was collected from 63 children: 21 5-year-old children with SLI, 21 language-matched typically-developing children and 21 age-matched typically-developing children. The negative sentences produced by children in the two control groups were consistently adult-like. In contrast, only 5 of the 21 children in the SLI group produced adult-like negative sentences with doesn't. The other 16 children with SLI produced a variety of non-adult negative sentences (e.g., It not fit, It's not fit, It not fits, It's not fits). The study concludes that children with SLI undergo an extended period in the development of sentential negation during which they produce a range of non-adult sentences that are similar to those previously reported in younger 2- to 3-year-old typically-developing children.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)228-264
    Number of pages37
    JournalFirst Language
    Volume36
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

    Keywords

    • Adverbial negation
    • Morphosyntax
    • Optional infinitives
    • Sentential negation
    • Specific language impairment
    • Tense

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Negative sentences in children with specific language impairment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this