Neoliberalism as language policy

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    This article explores how an economic ideology—neoliberalism—serves as a covert language policy mechanism pushing the global spread of English. Our analysis builds on a case study of the spread of English as a medium of instruction (MoI) in South Korean higher education. The Asian financial crisis of 1997/98 was the catalyst for a set of socioeconomic transformations that led to the imposition of “competitiveness” as a core value. Competition is heavily structured through a host of testing, assessment, and ranking mechanisms, many of which explicitly privilege English as a terrain where individual and societal worth are established. University rankings are one such mechanism structuring competition and constituting a covert form of language policy. One ranking criterion—internationalization—is particularly easy to manipulate and strongly favors English MoI. We conclude by reflecting on the social costs of elevating competitiveness to a core value enacted on the terrain of language choice. (English as a global language, globalization, higher education, medium of instruction (MoI), neoliberalism, South Korea, university rankings)
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationLanguage and globalization
    Subtitle of host publicationcritical concepts in linguistics
    EditorsIngrid Piller, Alexandra Grey
    Place of PublicationLondon
    PublisherRoutledge, Taylor and Francis Group
    Chapter17
    Pages362-384
    Number of pages22
    Volume1
    ISBN (Print)9781138291966, 9781138291973
    Publication statusPublished - 2019

    Publication series

    NameCritical Concepts in Linguistics
    PublisherRoutledge

    Bibliographical note

    Previously published in Language in society, 42(1), p.23-44 (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404512000887 (2012000924)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Neoliberalism as language policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this