New adulthood: personal or social transition?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding contributionResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The life course is part of our taken-for-granted stock of knowledge, even though the temporal boundaries of its phases have shifted under pressure from changing conditions. A case in point is adolescence. Previously largely overlapping with the teen-age period, it has now been extended to cover what used to be young adulthood. The reason lies in the way of life of many individuals in this age group (roughly 18-30) which no longer corresponds to generally accepted features of adulthood, most particularly economic independence and social stability. In the social sciences a sub-category of postadolescence has emerged as a label for such lifestyles. In turn, the media and marketing professionals have captured the emergent phenomenon labelling its progenitors kidults, adultescents, rejuveniles, etc. While implicitly acknowledging change, these labels are conservative since they rest on established assumptions about what it means to be adult. I challenge this position and argue that social forces have propelled young people into patterns of action inconceivable to the previous generation. Through this, rather than eschewing adulthood per se, they have forged a new adulthood. On both theoretical and empirical grounds, I suggest that the putative postadolescents do not need to catch up with 'normal' adulthood. Rather, we need to develop a new understanding of what adulthood means in the social world people are facing today – a world which is very different from the one in which the previous generation has had its maturity acknowledged.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationSocial change in the 21st century
Subtitle of host publicationconference proceedings
EditorsC. Bailey, L. Buys
Place of PublicationBrisbane
PublisherCentre for Social Change Research, School of Humanities and Human Services, Queensland University of Technology
Number of pages9
ISBN (Print)1741071089
Publication statusPublished - 2005
EventConference on Social Change in the 21st Century - Brisbane
Duration: 28 Oct 200528 Oct 2005

Conference

ConferenceConference on Social Change in the 21st Century
CityBrisbane
Period28/10/0528/10/05

Fingerprint

adulthood
social stability
way of life
maturity
adolescence
age group
marketing
social science
economics

Keywords

  • adulthood
  • postadolescence
  • social change
  • recognition
  • sociology

Cite this

Blatterer, H. (2005). New adulthood: personal or social transition? In C. Bailey, & L. Buys (Eds.), Social change in the 21st century: conference proceedings Brisbane: Centre for Social Change Research, School of Humanities and Human Services, Queensland University of Technology.
Blatterer, Harry. / New adulthood : personal or social transition?. Social change in the 21st century: conference proceedings. editor / C. Bailey ; L. Buys. Brisbane : Centre for Social Change Research, School of Humanities and Human Services, Queensland University of Technology, 2005.
@inproceedings{5dad7a15bd944c3ab15befa40c809a41,
title = "New adulthood: personal or social transition?",
abstract = "The life course is part of our taken-for-granted stock of knowledge, even though the temporal boundaries of its phases have shifted under pressure from changing conditions. A case in point is adolescence. Previously largely overlapping with the teen-age period, it has now been extended to cover what used to be young adulthood. The reason lies in the way of life of many individuals in this age group (roughly 18-30) which no longer corresponds to generally accepted features of adulthood, most particularly economic independence and social stability. In the social sciences a sub-category of postadolescence has emerged as a label for such lifestyles. In turn, the media and marketing professionals have captured the emergent phenomenon labelling its progenitors kidults, adultescents, rejuveniles, etc. While implicitly acknowledging change, these labels are conservative since they rest on established assumptions about what it means to be adult. I challenge this position and argue that social forces have propelled young people into patterns of action inconceivable to the previous generation. Through this, rather than eschewing adulthood per se, they have forged a new adulthood. On both theoretical and empirical grounds, I suggest that the putative postadolescents do not need to catch up with 'normal' adulthood. Rather, we need to develop a new understanding of what adulthood means in the social world people are facing today – a world which is very different from the one in which the previous generation has had its maturity acknowledged.",
keywords = "adulthood, postadolescence, social change, recognition, sociology",
author = "Harry Blatterer",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
isbn = "1741071089",
editor = "C. Bailey and L. Buys",
booktitle = "Social change in the 21st century",
publisher = "Centre for Social Change Research, School of Humanities and Human Services, Queensland University of Technology",

}

Blatterer, H 2005, New adulthood: personal or social transition? in C Bailey & L Buys (eds), Social change in the 21st century: conference proceedings. Centre for Social Change Research, School of Humanities and Human Services, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Conference on Social Change in the 21st Century, Brisbane, 28/10/05.

New adulthood : personal or social transition? / Blatterer, Harry.

Social change in the 21st century: conference proceedings. ed. / C. Bailey; L. Buys. Brisbane : Centre for Social Change Research, School of Humanities and Human Services, Queensland University of Technology, 2005.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding contributionResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - New adulthood

T2 - personal or social transition?

AU - Blatterer, Harry

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The life course is part of our taken-for-granted stock of knowledge, even though the temporal boundaries of its phases have shifted under pressure from changing conditions. A case in point is adolescence. Previously largely overlapping with the teen-age period, it has now been extended to cover what used to be young adulthood. The reason lies in the way of life of many individuals in this age group (roughly 18-30) which no longer corresponds to generally accepted features of adulthood, most particularly economic independence and social stability. In the social sciences a sub-category of postadolescence has emerged as a label for such lifestyles. In turn, the media and marketing professionals have captured the emergent phenomenon labelling its progenitors kidults, adultescents, rejuveniles, etc. While implicitly acknowledging change, these labels are conservative since they rest on established assumptions about what it means to be adult. I challenge this position and argue that social forces have propelled young people into patterns of action inconceivable to the previous generation. Through this, rather than eschewing adulthood per se, they have forged a new adulthood. On both theoretical and empirical grounds, I suggest that the putative postadolescents do not need to catch up with 'normal' adulthood. Rather, we need to develop a new understanding of what adulthood means in the social world people are facing today – a world which is very different from the one in which the previous generation has had its maturity acknowledged.

AB - The life course is part of our taken-for-granted stock of knowledge, even though the temporal boundaries of its phases have shifted under pressure from changing conditions. A case in point is adolescence. Previously largely overlapping with the teen-age period, it has now been extended to cover what used to be young adulthood. The reason lies in the way of life of many individuals in this age group (roughly 18-30) which no longer corresponds to generally accepted features of adulthood, most particularly economic independence and social stability. In the social sciences a sub-category of postadolescence has emerged as a label for such lifestyles. In turn, the media and marketing professionals have captured the emergent phenomenon labelling its progenitors kidults, adultescents, rejuveniles, etc. While implicitly acknowledging change, these labels are conservative since they rest on established assumptions about what it means to be adult. I challenge this position and argue that social forces have propelled young people into patterns of action inconceivable to the previous generation. Through this, rather than eschewing adulthood per se, they have forged a new adulthood. On both theoretical and empirical grounds, I suggest that the putative postadolescents do not need to catch up with 'normal' adulthood. Rather, we need to develop a new understanding of what adulthood means in the social world people are facing today – a world which is very different from the one in which the previous generation has had its maturity acknowledged.

KW - adulthood

KW - postadolescence

KW - social change

KW - recognition

KW - sociology

M3 - Conference proceeding contribution

SN - 1741071089

BT - Social change in the 21st century

A2 - Bailey, C.

A2 - Buys, L.

PB - Centre for Social Change Research, School of Humanities and Human Services, Queensland University of Technology

CY - Brisbane

ER -

Blatterer H. New adulthood: personal or social transition? In Bailey C, Buys L, editors, Social change in the 21st century: conference proceedings. Brisbane: Centre for Social Change Research, School of Humanities and Human Services, Queensland University of Technology. 2005