Nice to you, nicer to me: does self-serving generosity diminish the reciprocal response?

Daniel Woods, Maroš Servátka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Reciprocity has been shown to be sensitive to perceived intentions, however, not much is known about the intensity of reciprocal responses to the precise nature of those intentions. For example, a person can strategically appear to be kind while being self-serving or can be selflessly (genuinely) kind. Do these two intentions elicit different reciprocal reactions? We propose a conjecture that self-serving but generous actions diminish the positively reciprocal response, compared to selfless generous actions. We classify actions that increase a recipient’s maximum payoff, but by less than the giver’s maximum payoff, as being self-serving generous actions, while classifying actions that increase a recipient’s maximum payoff by more than the giver’s as selfless generous actions. We hypothesize that selfless generous actions are considered more generous than self-serving generous actions, and that self-serving generous actions will therefore result in a diminished reciprocal response. We test this conjecture using two novel experimental designs. We find some evidence that subjects perceive self-serving generous actions as being less generous than selfless generous actions, but no empirical support for our conjecture on the diminished reciprocal response.

LanguageEnglish
Pages506-529
Number of pages24
JournalExperimental Economics
Volume22
Issue number2
Early online date2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Generosity
Experimental design

Keywords

  • reciprocity
  • generosity
  • self-serving
  • genuine
  • experiment
  • lost wallet game
  • investment game

Cite this

@article{37caa653f86641afa6a87634ce003675,
title = "Nice to you, nicer to me: does self-serving generosity diminish the reciprocal response?",
abstract = "Reciprocity has been shown to be sensitive to perceived intentions, however, not much is known about the intensity of reciprocal responses to the precise nature of those intentions. For example, a person can strategically appear to be kind while being self-serving or can be selflessly (genuinely) kind. Do these two intentions elicit different reciprocal reactions? We propose a conjecture that self-serving but generous actions diminish the positively reciprocal response, compared to selfless generous actions. We classify actions that increase a recipient’s maximum payoff, but by less than the giver’s maximum payoff, as being self-serving generous actions, while classifying actions that increase a recipient’s maximum payoff by more than the giver’s as selfless generous actions. We hypothesize that selfless generous actions are considered more generous than self-serving generous actions, and that self-serving generous actions will therefore result in a diminished reciprocal response. We test this conjecture using two novel experimental designs. We find some evidence that subjects perceive self-serving generous actions as being less generous than selfless generous actions, but no empirical support for our conjecture on the diminished reciprocal response.",
keywords = "reciprocity, generosity, self-serving, genuine, experiment, lost wallet game , investment game",
author = "Daniel Woods and Maroš Serv{\'a}tka",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/s10683-018-9561-8",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "506--529",
journal = "Experimental Economics",
issn = "1386-4157",
publisher = "Springer, Springer Nature",
number = "2",

}

Nice to you, nicer to me : does self-serving generosity diminish the reciprocal response? / Woods, Daniel; Servátka, Maroš.

In: Experimental Economics, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2019, p. 506-529.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nice to you, nicer to me

T2 - Experimental Economics

AU - Woods, Daniel

AU - Servátka, Maroš

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Reciprocity has been shown to be sensitive to perceived intentions, however, not much is known about the intensity of reciprocal responses to the precise nature of those intentions. For example, a person can strategically appear to be kind while being self-serving or can be selflessly (genuinely) kind. Do these two intentions elicit different reciprocal reactions? We propose a conjecture that self-serving but generous actions diminish the positively reciprocal response, compared to selfless generous actions. We classify actions that increase a recipient’s maximum payoff, but by less than the giver’s maximum payoff, as being self-serving generous actions, while classifying actions that increase a recipient’s maximum payoff by more than the giver’s as selfless generous actions. We hypothesize that selfless generous actions are considered more generous than self-serving generous actions, and that self-serving generous actions will therefore result in a diminished reciprocal response. We test this conjecture using two novel experimental designs. We find some evidence that subjects perceive self-serving generous actions as being less generous than selfless generous actions, but no empirical support for our conjecture on the diminished reciprocal response.

AB - Reciprocity has been shown to be sensitive to perceived intentions, however, not much is known about the intensity of reciprocal responses to the precise nature of those intentions. For example, a person can strategically appear to be kind while being self-serving or can be selflessly (genuinely) kind. Do these two intentions elicit different reciprocal reactions? We propose a conjecture that self-serving but generous actions diminish the positively reciprocal response, compared to selfless generous actions. We classify actions that increase a recipient’s maximum payoff, but by less than the giver’s maximum payoff, as being self-serving generous actions, while classifying actions that increase a recipient’s maximum payoff by more than the giver’s as selfless generous actions. We hypothesize that selfless generous actions are considered more generous than self-serving generous actions, and that self-serving generous actions will therefore result in a diminished reciprocal response. We test this conjecture using two novel experimental designs. We find some evidence that subjects perceive self-serving generous actions as being less generous than selfless generous actions, but no empirical support for our conjecture on the diminished reciprocal response.

KW - reciprocity

KW - generosity

KW - self-serving

KW - genuine

KW - experiment

KW - lost wallet game

KW - investment game

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041199327&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10683-018-9561-8

DO - 10.1007/s10683-018-9561-8

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 506

EP - 529

JO - Experimental Economics

JF - Experimental Economics

SN - 1386-4157

IS - 2

ER -