No evidence for adaptive differential sex allocation in red junglefowl (Gallus gallus)

Timothy H. Parker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In many situations, selection should favor females that bias the sex ratio of their offspring. Two commonly examined factors potentially influencing offspring sex ratio are paternal ornamentation and maternal condition. Male junglefowl with larger combs are attractive to females. I housed female Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus) with sterile male consorts and artificially inseminated them with sperm from other males that the females never saw. I found no relationship between either the comb size of the consort or the comb size of the sperm donor and the sex ratio of the offspring. I previously reported a significant sex ratio bias related to maternal mass in Red Junglefowl. However, that analysis was based on sex ratio data not weighted for brood size and assuming a normal distribution. Here, I show that this effect disappears when I conduct a more appropriate analysis weighting sex ratio according to brood size and accounting for the binomial error distribution. I also failed to find evidence that male chicks hatch from larger eggs than female chicks. These results suggest that Red Junglefowl females may not bias the sex ratio of their brood in response to either their own condition or the attractiveness of the males with whom they copulate. Furthermore, these results demonstrate the importance of choosing the correct methods of sex ratio analysis.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1161-1168
Number of pages8
JournalAuk
Volume122
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

sex allocation
Gallus gallus
sex ratio
brood size
sperm
chicks
spermatozoa
ornamentation
egg

Keywords

  • Binomial distribution
  • Gallus gallus
  • Generalized linear mixed model
  • Red Junglefowl
  • Sex ratio
  • Sexual selection

Cite this

Parker, Timothy H. / No evidence for adaptive differential sex allocation in red junglefowl (Gallus gallus). In: Auk. 2005 ; Vol. 122, No. 4. pp. 1161-1168.
@article{5a08e35dd65a4bc78d1fcf1f9126d337,
title = "No evidence for adaptive differential sex allocation in red junglefowl (Gallus gallus)",
abstract = "In many situations, selection should favor females that bias the sex ratio of their offspring. Two commonly examined factors potentially influencing offspring sex ratio are paternal ornamentation and maternal condition. Male junglefowl with larger combs are attractive to females. I housed female Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus) with sterile male consorts and artificially inseminated them with sperm from other males that the females never saw. I found no relationship between either the comb size of the consort or the comb size of the sperm donor and the sex ratio of the offspring. I previously reported a significant sex ratio bias related to maternal mass in Red Junglefowl. However, that analysis was based on sex ratio data not weighted for brood size and assuming a normal distribution. Here, I show that this effect disappears when I conduct a more appropriate analysis weighting sex ratio according to brood size and accounting for the binomial error distribution. I also failed to find evidence that male chicks hatch from larger eggs than female chicks. These results suggest that Red Junglefowl females may not bias the sex ratio of their brood in response to either their own condition or the attractiveness of the males with whom they copulate. Furthermore, these results demonstrate the importance of choosing the correct methods of sex ratio analysis.",
keywords = "Binomial distribution, Gallus gallus, Generalized linear mixed model, Red Junglefowl, Sex ratio, Sexual selection",
author = "Parker, {Timothy H.}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[1161:NEFADS]2.0.CO;2",
language = "English",
volume = "122",
pages = "1161--1168",
journal = "Auk",
issn = "0004-8038",
publisher = "AMER ORNITHOLOGISTS UNION",
number = "4",

}

No evidence for adaptive differential sex allocation in red junglefowl (Gallus gallus). / Parker, Timothy H.

In: Auk, Vol. 122, No. 4, 2005, p. 1161-1168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - No evidence for adaptive differential sex allocation in red junglefowl (Gallus gallus)

AU - Parker, Timothy H.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - In many situations, selection should favor females that bias the sex ratio of their offspring. Two commonly examined factors potentially influencing offspring sex ratio are paternal ornamentation and maternal condition. Male junglefowl with larger combs are attractive to females. I housed female Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus) with sterile male consorts and artificially inseminated them with sperm from other males that the females never saw. I found no relationship between either the comb size of the consort or the comb size of the sperm donor and the sex ratio of the offspring. I previously reported a significant sex ratio bias related to maternal mass in Red Junglefowl. However, that analysis was based on sex ratio data not weighted for brood size and assuming a normal distribution. Here, I show that this effect disappears when I conduct a more appropriate analysis weighting sex ratio according to brood size and accounting for the binomial error distribution. I also failed to find evidence that male chicks hatch from larger eggs than female chicks. These results suggest that Red Junglefowl females may not bias the sex ratio of their brood in response to either their own condition or the attractiveness of the males with whom they copulate. Furthermore, these results demonstrate the importance of choosing the correct methods of sex ratio analysis.

AB - In many situations, selection should favor females that bias the sex ratio of their offspring. Two commonly examined factors potentially influencing offspring sex ratio are paternal ornamentation and maternal condition. Male junglefowl with larger combs are attractive to females. I housed female Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus) with sterile male consorts and artificially inseminated them with sperm from other males that the females never saw. I found no relationship between either the comb size of the consort or the comb size of the sperm donor and the sex ratio of the offspring. I previously reported a significant sex ratio bias related to maternal mass in Red Junglefowl. However, that analysis was based on sex ratio data not weighted for brood size and assuming a normal distribution. Here, I show that this effect disappears when I conduct a more appropriate analysis weighting sex ratio according to brood size and accounting for the binomial error distribution. I also failed to find evidence that male chicks hatch from larger eggs than female chicks. These results suggest that Red Junglefowl females may not bias the sex ratio of their brood in response to either their own condition or the attractiveness of the males with whom they copulate. Furthermore, these results demonstrate the importance of choosing the correct methods of sex ratio analysis.

KW - Binomial distribution

KW - Gallus gallus

KW - Generalized linear mixed model

KW - Red Junglefowl

KW - Sex ratio

KW - Sexual selection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28744449026&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[1161:NEFADS]2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[1161:NEFADS]2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

VL - 122

SP - 1161

EP - 1168

JO - Auk

T2 - Auk

JF - Auk

SN - 0004-8038

IS - 4

ER -