TY - CHAP
T1 - Non-care in the detention hotel
T2 - 20 years of Australia's use of 'alternative places of detention'
AU - Burridge, Andrew
N1 - Copyright the Author(s). Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - As part of its vast detention landscape, the Australian government has officially used hotels, motels and other forms of non-purpose-built accommodation to detain asylum seekers, refugees and immigration deportees since 2002. Detaining persons within hotels – classified as ‘alternative places of detention’ (APODs) – has however remained relatively unknown in contrast to the use of purpose-built detention centre facilities. This chapter examines the development and implementation of APODs within the broader Australian detention landscape, initially promoted as a means to remove women and children from detention facilities and to provide access to medical and other care within the community. Drawing upon detainee accounts, media reporting, independent inquiries and official inspections of these sites, it is argued that APODs can be more accurately understood as sites of non-care. APODs are framed as spaces of ‘cramping’ and ‘choking’ that, instead of reducing detention-like conditions, often exacerbate existing health concerns through their carceral adaptability.
AB - As part of its vast detention landscape, the Australian government has officially used hotels, motels and other forms of non-purpose-built accommodation to detain asylum seekers, refugees and immigration deportees since 2002. Detaining persons within hotels – classified as ‘alternative places of detention’ (APODs) – has however remained relatively unknown in contrast to the use of purpose-built detention centre facilities. This chapter examines the development and implementation of APODs within the broader Australian detention landscape, initially promoted as a means to remove women and children from detention facilities and to provide access to medical and other care within the community. Drawing upon detainee accounts, media reporting, independent inquiries and official inspections of these sites, it is argued that APODs can be more accurately understood as sites of non-care. APODs are framed as spaces of ‘cramping’ and ‘choking’ that, instead of reducing detention-like conditions, often exacerbate existing health concerns through their carceral adaptability.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105020659902
U2 - 10.51952/9781529222852.ch010
DO - 10.51952/9781529222852.ch010
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9781529222838
T3 - Global Migration and Social Change
SP - 174
EP - 200
BT - Refugee reception and camps
A2 - Oesch, Lucas
A2 - Lemaire, Léa
PB - Bristol University Press
CY - Bristol
ER -