Abstract
Section 52 can impose liability on account of non-disclosure, or "silence". This liability is broader than that imposed at general law. This article examines the significant markers which chart this head of liability. Key issues include: the significance of silence per se in contrast to half-truths; whether non-disclosure in the context of pre-contractual negotiations is more or less significant than non-disclosure in other contexts; the role of the general law principles in applying Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), s 52 in this context; and whether the party sought to be made liable under s 52 on account of non-disclosure must be shown to have acted advertently.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 653-664 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Australian Law Journal |
| Volume | 78 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| Publication status | Published - 2004 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Non-disclosure: Trade Practices Act, s52'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver