Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Non-fasting lipids: a change in practice

Tim Tse*, Bosco Wu, Simon Willcock, Sanjyot Vagholkar

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Over the past decade, multiple guidelines by cardiovascular societies around the world have advised that testing for non-fasting lipids be recommended in preference to fasting lipids to assess for cardiovascular risk.1–4 However, Australia’s most recent guideline on cardiovascular risk was published in 2012 prior to the aforementioned worldwide changes and continues to suggest the use of a fasting lipid profile to assess absolute cardiovascular risk.5 Australian general practitioners (GPs) and their patients may not be aware of this global paradigm shift in testing, which has significant benefits to the patient, doctor and society. Indeed, one could argue that the non-fasting state is more representative of cardiovascular risk, as humans spend most time in the postprandial condition. We highlight below current recommendations from around the world and the rationale for shifting from fasting to non-fasting

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-382
Number of pages2
JournalAustralian Journal of General Practice
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Non-fasting lipids: a change in practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this