Norms, causes, and alternative possibilities

Peter Menzies*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/opinion

3 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

I agree with Knobe's claim in his Person as Scientist, Person as Moralist article that moral considerations are integral to the workings of people's competence in making causal judgments. However, I disagree with the particular explanation he gives of the way in which moral considerations influence causal judgments. I critically scrutinize his explanation and outline a better one.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)346-347
Number of pages2
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2010

Bibliographical note

Copyright 2010 Cambridge University Press. Article originally published in Behavioral and brain sciences, vol. 33, iss 04, pp. 346-347. The original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10001834.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Norms, causes, and alternative possibilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this