Nurturing longevity: Sociological constructions of ageing, care and the body

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines assumptions that surround the way that aged care and assistance is conceptualised and discussed. Problems with the concept of care became apparent with the critique of care theory by the disability movement in the 1980s and continue to this day. Debates arose initially between those who sought to identify care as a gender-based duty that serves to burden those who take responsibility for it, and those who reject the concept as a form of socially constructed dependency. The paper considers the problematic sociological foundations of this critique - the failure to incorporate an understanding of the body into much sociological theory and the significance that the conceptualisation has for understanding the need for personal assistance in advanced old age. While the disability critique of care is firmly grounded in a sociological analysis, it overemphasises the social construction of social relations and ignores the visceral reality of the body. Longevity care, in contrast, needs to explicitly acknowledge that ageing is an embodied and physical process that generates a need for care. The conclusions are tested against recent Australian data and research on care needs and preferences amongst older people.

LanguageEnglish
Pages33-42
Number of pages10
JournalHealth Sociology Review
Volume23
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Physical Phenomena
assistance
disability
need for care
Research
sociological theory
old age
social construction
Social Relations
responsibility
gender
Social Theory
Dependency (Psychology)

Cite this

@article{56284d91150147e08de0b09aebd7303b,
title = "Nurturing longevity: Sociological constructions of ageing, care and the body",
abstract = "This paper examines assumptions that surround the way that aged care and assistance is conceptualised and discussed. Problems with the concept of care became apparent with the critique of care theory by the disability movement in the 1980s and continue to this day. Debates arose initially between those who sought to identify care as a gender-based duty that serves to burden those who take responsibility for it, and those who reject the concept as a form of socially constructed dependency. The paper considers the problematic sociological foundations of this critique - the failure to incorporate an understanding of the body into much sociological theory and the significance that the conceptualisation has for understanding the need for personal assistance in advanced old age. While the disability critique of care is firmly grounded in a sociological analysis, it overemphasises the social construction of social relations and ignores the visceral reality of the body. Longevity care, in contrast, needs to explicitly acknowledge that ageing is an embodied and physical process that generates a need for care. The conclusions are tested against recent Australian data and research on care needs and preferences amongst older people.",
author = "Michael Fine",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "33--42",
journal = "Health Sociology Review",
issn = "1446-1242",
publisher = "eContent Management",
number = "1",

}

Nurturing longevity : Sociological constructions of ageing, care and the body. / Fine, Michael.

In: Health Sociology Review, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2014, p. 33-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nurturing longevity

T2 - Health Sociology Review

AU - Fine, Michael

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This paper examines assumptions that surround the way that aged care and assistance is conceptualised and discussed. Problems with the concept of care became apparent with the critique of care theory by the disability movement in the 1980s and continue to this day. Debates arose initially between those who sought to identify care as a gender-based duty that serves to burden those who take responsibility for it, and those who reject the concept as a form of socially constructed dependency. The paper considers the problematic sociological foundations of this critique - the failure to incorporate an understanding of the body into much sociological theory and the significance that the conceptualisation has for understanding the need for personal assistance in advanced old age. While the disability critique of care is firmly grounded in a sociological analysis, it overemphasises the social construction of social relations and ignores the visceral reality of the body. Longevity care, in contrast, needs to explicitly acknowledge that ageing is an embodied and physical process that generates a need for care. The conclusions are tested against recent Australian data and research on care needs and preferences amongst older people.

AB - This paper examines assumptions that surround the way that aged care and assistance is conceptualised and discussed. Problems with the concept of care became apparent with the critique of care theory by the disability movement in the 1980s and continue to this day. Debates arose initially between those who sought to identify care as a gender-based duty that serves to burden those who take responsibility for it, and those who reject the concept as a form of socially constructed dependency. The paper considers the problematic sociological foundations of this critique - the failure to incorporate an understanding of the body into much sociological theory and the significance that the conceptualisation has for understanding the need for personal assistance in advanced old age. While the disability critique of care is firmly grounded in a sociological analysis, it overemphasises the social construction of social relations and ignores the visceral reality of the body. Longevity care, in contrast, needs to explicitly acknowledge that ageing is an embodied and physical process that generates a need for care. The conclusions are tested against recent Australian data and research on care needs and preferences amongst older people.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908193610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 33

EP - 42

JO - Health Sociology Review

JF - Health Sociology Review

SN - 1446-1242

IS - 1

ER -