On being cruel to a chair

Jonny Robinson*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Can one be cruel to an inanimate object? In the following I argue that one can in fact be cruel to an inanimate object, defining cruelty as taking pleasure in intentionally causing suffering to another person, animal or (in this case) inanimate object, whether such suffering be genuine, mistakenly believed, or sincerely hoped for. I label the conception of cruelty in question ‘agent-subjective, possible mistake of fact’, and touch upon some implications of this.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-91
Number of pages9
JournalAnalysis
Volume79
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

Keywords

  • cruelty
  • vice
  • virtue ethics
  • mistake of fact
  • motives
  • intention
  • Barrozo

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On being cruel to a chair'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this