Abstract
Can one be cruel to an inanimate object? In the following I argue that one can in fact be cruel to an inanimate object, defining cruelty as taking pleasure in intentionally causing suffering to another person, animal or (in this case) inanimate object, whether such suffering be genuine, mistakenly believed, or sincerely hoped for. I label the conception of cruelty in question ‘agent-subjective, possible mistake of fact’, and touch upon some implications of this.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 83-91 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Analysis |
Volume | 79 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2019 |
Keywords
- cruelty
- vice
- virtue ethics
- mistake of fact
- motives
- intention
- Barrozo