On poverty, politics and psychology: The socioeconomic gradient of mental healthcare utilisation and outcomes

Jaime Delgadillo*, Miqdad Asaria, Shehzad Ali, Simon Gilbody

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since 2008, the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme has disseminated evidence-based interventions for depression and anxiety problems. In order to maintain quality standards, government policy in England sets the expectation that 50% of treated patients should meet recovery criteria according to validated patient-reported outcome measures. Using national IAPT data, we found evidence suggesting that the prevalence of mental health problems is greater in poorer areas and that these areas had lower average recovery rates. After adjusting benchmarks for local index of multiple deprivation, we found significant differences between unadjusted (72.5%) and adjusted (43.1%) proportions of underperforming clinical commissioning group areas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)429-430
Number of pages2
JournalBritish Journal of Psychiatry
Volume209
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On poverty, politics and psychology: The socioeconomic gradient of mental healthcare utilisation and outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this