On structuring subjective judgements

Originality, significance and rigour in RAE2008

Ron Johnston*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 2008 United Kingdom Research Assessment Exercise will involve the evaluation of thousands of individual research outputs. The Funding Councils set three criteria for those evaluations - Originality, rigour and significance -and required each output to be placed into a fivefold categorisation of excellence, using absolute rather than relative judgements. The various panels and sub-panels convened to undertake those evaluations were asked to provide their own interpretations of both the criteria and the categories. This paper analyses those, and finds that they are no less subjective than the generic descriptions provided by the central organisation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)120-147
Number of pages28
JournalHigher Education Quarterly
Volume62
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'On structuring subjective judgements: Originality, significance and rigour in RAE2008'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this