Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

One suitcase, two grammars: what can we conclude about Australian Turkish heritage speakers' divergent processing of evidentiality?

Suzan D. Tokaç-Scheffer*, Lyndsey Nickels, Seçkin Arslan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study investigates the processing of evidentiality using an auditory sentence verification task in heritage speakers of Turkish residing in Sydney, Australia. Evidentiality is a grammatical category that marks the sources of information through which the speaker comes to know information regarding an event. Turkish obligatorily marks two distinct forms of direct and indirect evidentials. We compare the sensitivity to evidentiality-information source mismatches of the speakers of Turkish as a heritage language to Turkish speakers who were late arrivals to Australia. The results show that the heritage language speakers perform less accurately and with longer response times than late arrivals, and both the groups' response accuracy is largely predicted by amount of exposure to Turkish during their development. The data suggest that heritage speakers of Turkish show insensitivity to evidentiality. Moreover, diminishing exposure to Turkish throughout heritage speakers' development appears to be an important trigger for divergent attainment of evidentiality in Turkish heritage grammar.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)125-138
Number of pages14
JournalLinguistics Vanguard
Volume10
Issue numbers2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2024. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • contact-induced language change
  • evidentiality
  • heritage language speakers
  • Turkish

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'One suitcase, two grammars: what can we conclude about Australian Turkish heritage speakers' divergent processing of evidentiality?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this