Online timing: why not?

Jordan Wehrman; Paul Sowman

doi:10.1016/j.metip.2021.100047

Online timing: why not?

Jordan Wehrman^*, Paul Sowman

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

40 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We examine participants' ability to accurately produce durations online, and their subjective ratings of performance. Given the push to move students online, it is necessary to transition to online experiments. However, this comes with certain challenges. Therefore, we performed a duration production task in which participants produced, then rated the accuracy of these productions. Generally, results support the capacity for duration production to be moved online. Further, participants are at least partially aware of the accuracy of their productions, though their estimates varied. However, a caveat to this is that duration productions were slightly longer than the target duration.

Original language	English
Article number	100047
Pages (from-to)	1-5
Number of pages	5
Journal	Methods in Psychology
Volume	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100047
Publication status	Published - Nov 2021

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2021. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

duration production
online methods
self-reported interval timing

Access to Document

10.1016/j.metip.2021.100047Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Publisher version (open access)Final published version, 754 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{bdb7f69e90e54bf58f4508bdd5a2ffb8,

title = "Online timing: why not?",

abstract = "We examine participants' ability to accurately produce durations online, and their subjective ratings of performance. Given the push to move students online, it is necessary to transition to online experiments. However, this comes with certain challenges. Therefore, we performed a duration production task in which participants produced, then rated the accuracy of these productions. Generally, results support the capacity for duration production to be moved online. Further, participants are at least partially aware of the accuracy of their productions, though their estimates varied. However, a caveat to this is that duration productions were slightly longer than the target duration.",

keywords = "duration production, online methods, self-reported interval timing",

author = "Jordan Wehrman and Paul Sowman",

note = "Copyright the Author(s) 2021. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.",

year = "2021",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1016/j.metip.2021.100047",

language = "English",

volume = "4",

pages = "1--5",

journal = "Methods in Psychology",

issn = "2590-2601",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Online timing

T2 - why not?

AU - Wehrman, Jordan

AU - Sowman, Paul

N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2021. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2021/11

Y1 - 2021/11

N2 - We examine participants' ability to accurately produce durations online, and their subjective ratings of performance. Given the push to move students online, it is necessary to transition to online experiments. However, this comes with certain challenges. Therefore, we performed a duration production task in which participants produced, then rated the accuracy of these productions. Generally, results support the capacity for duration production to be moved online. Further, participants are at least partially aware of the accuracy of their productions, though their estimates varied. However, a caveat to this is that duration productions were slightly longer than the target duration.

AB - We examine participants' ability to accurately produce durations online, and their subjective ratings of performance. Given the push to move students online, it is necessary to transition to online experiments. However, this comes with certain challenges. Therefore, we performed a duration production task in which participants produced, then rated the accuracy of these productions. Generally, results support the capacity for duration production to be moved online. Further, participants are at least partially aware of the accuracy of their productions, though their estimates varied. However, a caveat to this is that duration productions were slightly longer than the target duration.

KW - duration production

KW - online methods

KW - self-reported interval timing

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85126822285

U2 - 10.1016/j.metip.2021.100047

DO - 10.1016/j.metip.2021.100047

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85126822285

SN - 2590-2601

VL - 4

SP - 1

EP - 5

JO - Methods in Psychology

JF - Methods in Psychology

M1 - 100047

ER -

Online timing: why not?

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this