Ontogenetic shifts in a prey's chemical defences influence feeding responses of a snake predator

John Llewelyn*, Kris Bell, Lin Schwarzkopf, Ross A. Alford, Richard Shine

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)


Foraging theory suggests that predator responses to potential prey should be influenced by prey chemical defences, but the effects of ontogenetic variation in such defences on prey vulnerability to predators remain unclear. Cane toads (Rhinella marina) are toxic to anurophagous snakes, including the keelback (Tropidonophis mairii, a natricine colubrid that occurs within the toads' invasive range in Australia). Toxin levels and diversity change through toad ontogeny, decreasing from the egg stage to metamorphosis, then increasing in postmetamorphic toads. If the toxin content of a prey item influences predator responses, we predict that keelbacks should exhibit selective predation on toads close to metamorphosis. The results of our laboratory trials on adult (field-collected, and thus toad-experienced) and hatchling (laboratory-incubated, and thus toad-naive) keelbacks supported this prediction. The snakes selectively consumed later-stage rather than earlier-stage tadpoles, and earlier-stage rather than later-stage metamorphs. Our data are thus consistent with the hypothesis that ontogenetic changes in toxin content can affect individuals' vulnerability to predation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)965-973
Number of pages9
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2012
Externally publishedYes


  • chemical defence
  • ontogeny
  • optimal foraging
  • Bufo marinus


Dive into the research topics of 'Ontogenetic shifts in a prey's chemical defences influence feeding responses of a snake predator'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this