Abstract
Background: Specific antimicrobial breast pocket irrigations have been proven over the past 20 years to reduce the incidence of capsular contracture by a factor of 10, and the emergence of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) and its link to bacteria/technique has created renewed interest in different antimicrobial breast pocket preparation agents. Our previous studies have identified that both Betadine-containing and non-Betadine-containing antimicrobial irrigations provide excellent broad-spectrum bacterial coverage. The current science of BIA-ALCL has implicated the Gram-negative microbiome as a key in pathogenesis.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to revisit the antimicrobial effectiveness of clinically utilized Betadine and non-Betadine solutions, along with other antimicrobial agents that have not yet been tested, against multiple organisms, including additional common Gram-negative bacteria associated with chronic breast implant infections/inflammation.
Methods: Current and new antimicrobial breast irrigations were tested via standard techniques for bactericidal activity against multiple Gram-positive and Gram-negative strains. Test results are detailed and clinical recommendations for current antimicrobial irrigations are provided.
Results: Betadine-containing irrigations were found to be superior according to the testing performed.
Conclusions: There are quite few misconceptions with regard to antimicrobial breast pocket irrigation. These are discussed and final evidence-based recommendations for practice are given.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 619-625 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Aesthetic Surgery Journal |
Volume | 40 |
Issue number | 6 |
Early online date | 10 Sept 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 16 May 2020 |