Oral vocabulary knowledge and learning to read new words: a theoretical review

Signy Wegener*, Elisabeth Beyersmann, Hua-Chen Wang, Anne Castles

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
34 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this theoretical review, evidence for the link between spoken and written word knowledge is summarised, highlighting the specific hypotheses posed in this field and the extent to which they are informative regarding causation. A brief overview of major theories of orthographic learning draws attention to how each characterises the role of oral vocabulary within the learning process, and the timing of its influence. The theoretical foundations and evidence for two cognitive mechanisms that seek to explain the relationship between spoken and written word knowledge are outlined, drawing attention to a key difference between them: the proposed timing of the effect. Set for variability (or mispronunciation correction) is thought to operate from the point of visual exposure, while orthographic skeletons are thought to exert an influence on written word learning that begins before exposure to written words. The review closes with a discussion of directions for future research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)253-278
Number of pages26
JournalAustralian Journal of Learning Difficulties
Volume27
Issue number2
Early online date12 Jul 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Oral vocabulary knowledge and learning to read new words: a theoretical review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this