Orally administered cannabidiol does not produce false-positive tests for Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on the Securetec DrugWipe® 5S or Dräger DrugTest® 5000

Danielle McCartney, Richard C. Kevin, Anastasia S. Suraev, Christopher Irwin, Ronald R. Grunstein, Camilla M. Hoyos, Iain S. McGregor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Many jurisdictions use point-of-collection (POC) oral fluid testing devices to identify driving under the influence of cannabis, indexed by the presence of Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), an intoxicating cannabinoid, in oral fluid. Although the use of the non-intoxicating cannabinoid, cannabidiol (CBD), is not prohibited among drivers, it is unclear whether these devices can reliably distinguish between CBD and THC, which have similar chemical structures. This study determined whether orally administered CBD produces false-positive tests for THC on standard, POC oral fluid testing devices. In a randomised, double-blind, crossover design, healthy participants (n = 17) completed four treatment sessions involving the administration of either placebo or 15-, 300- or 1500-mg pure CBD in a high-fat dietary supplement. Oral fluid was sampled, and the DrugWipe®-5S (DW-5S; 10 ng·ml −1 THC cut-off) and Drug Test® 5000 (DT5000; 10 ng·mL −1 THC cut-off) devices administered, at baseline (pretreatment) and ~20-, ~145- and ~185-min posttreatment. Oral fluid cannabinoid concentrations were measured using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) oral fluid CBD concentrations were highest at ~20 min, quantified as 0.4 (6.0), 15.8 (41.6) and 167 (233) ng·ml −1 on the 15-, 300- and 1500-mg CBD treatments, respectively. THC, cannabinol and cannabigerol were not detected in any samples. A total of 259 DW-5S and 256 DT5000 tests were successfully completed, and no THC-positive tests were observed. Orally administered CBD does not appear to produce false-positive (or true-positive) tests for THC on the DW-5S and DT5000. The likelihood of an individual who is using a CBD (only) oral formulation being falsely accused of DUIC therefore appears low.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-143
Number of pages7
JournalDrug Testing and Analysis
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2022
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2021. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • cannabidiol
  • cannabis
  • drug driving
  • oral fluid
  • point-of-collection testing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Orally administered cannabidiol does not produce false-positive tests for Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on the Securetec DrugWipe® 5S or Dräger DrugTest® 5000'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this