Organizational change and the importance of embedded assumptions

Ian Palmer, Richard Dunford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Citations (Scopus)


'Managing change' appears a simple enough term. However, no common ontological assumption underlies either the notion of 'managing' or that of 'change'. In this paper, we identify different assumptions about both what it means to manage and the nature of change outcomes. From these assumptions we derive six different images of managing organizational change: directing, navigating, caretaking, coaching, interpreting and nurturing. We show how each image is underpinned by different organization theories. We then take each image and show how the differing ontological assumptions about managing and change outcomes are associated with different research agendas. We illustrate this by focusing on three elements commonly associated with managing organizational change: vision, communication and resistance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S20-S32
Number of pages13
JournalBritish Journal of Management
Issue numberSuppl. 1
Publication statusPublished - 2008


Dive into the research topics of 'Organizational change and the importance of embedded assumptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this