Orthogonal basis with a conicoid first mode for shape specification of optical surfaces: comment

G. W. Forbes

doi:10.1364/OE.24.016496

Orthogonal basis with a conicoid first mode for shape specification of optical surfaces: comment

G. W. Forbes^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Potentially misleading results follow from an error in a recent paper, namely [Opt. Express 24, 5448-5462 (2016)], that contains a comparative analysis of schemes for specifying shape. Some corrections are presented for clarification. Additional comments are offered in relation to practical goals in this area of research.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	16496-16498
Number of pages	3
Journal	Optics Express
Volume	24
Issue number	15
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.016496
Publication status	Published - 25 Jul 2016

Access to Document

10.1364/OE.24.016496Licence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{b8241c3d301b4942a6873a72522c02d8,

title = "Orthogonal basis with a conicoid first mode for shape specification of optical surfaces: comment",

abstract = "Potentially misleading results follow from an error in a recent paper, namely [Opt. Express 24, 5448-5462 (2016)], that contains a comparative analysis of schemes for specifying shape. Some corrections are presented for clarification. Additional comments are offered in relation to practical goals in this area of research.",

author = "Forbes, {G. W.}",

year = "2016",

month = jul,

day = "25",

doi = "10.1364/OE.24.016496",

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "16496--16498",

journal = "Optics Express",

issn = "1094-4087",

publisher = "OPTICAL SOC AMER",

number = "15",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Orthogonal basis with a conicoid first mode for shape specification of optical surfaces

T2 - comment

AU - Forbes, G. W.

PY - 2016/7/25

Y1 - 2016/7/25

N2 - Potentially misleading results follow from an error in a recent paper, namely [Opt. Express 24, 5448-5462 (2016)], that contains a comparative analysis of schemes for specifying shape. Some corrections are presented for clarification. Additional comments are offered in relation to practical goals in this area of research.

AB - Potentially misleading results follow from an error in a recent paper, namely [Opt. Express 24, 5448-5462 (2016)], that contains a comparative analysis of schemes for specifying shape. Some corrections are presented for clarification. Additional comments are offered in relation to practical goals in this area of research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979598085&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1364/OE.24.016496

DO - 10.1364/OE.24.016496

M3 - Article

C2 - 27464103

AN - SCOPUS:84979598085

SN - 1094-4087

VL - 24

SP - 16496

EP - 16498

JO - Optics Express

JF - Optics Express

IS - 15

ER -

Orthogonal basis with a conicoid first mode for shape specification of optical surfaces: comment

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this