Our current approach to root cause analysis: is it contributing to our failure to improve patient safety?

Kathryn M. Kellogg*, Zach Hettinger, Manish Shah, Robert L. Wears, Craig R. Sellers, Melissa Squires, Rollin J. Fairbanks

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Despite over a decade of efforts to reduce the adverse event rate in healthcare, the rate has remained relatively unchanged. Root cause analysis (RCA) is a process used by hospitals in an attempt to reduce adverse event rates; however, the outputs of this process have not been well studied in healthcare. This study aimed to examine the types of solutions proposed in RCAs over an 8-year period at a major academic medical institution. Methods All state-reportable adverse events were gathered, and those for which an RCA was performed were analysed. A consensus rating process was used to determine a severity rating for each case. A qualitative approach was used to categorise the types of solutions proposed by the RCA team in each case and descriptive statistics were calculated. Results 302 RCAs were reviewed. The most common event types involved a procedure complication, followed by cardiopulmonary arrest, neurological deficit and retained foreign body. In 106 RCAs, solutions were proposed. A large proportion (38.7%) of RCAs with solutions proposed involved a patient death. Of the 731 proposed solutions, the most common solution types were training (20%), process change (19.6%) and policy reinforcement (15.2%). We found that multiple event types were repeated in the study period, despite repeated RCAs. Conclusions This study found that the most commonly proposed solutions were weaker actions, which were less likely to decrease event recurrence. These findings support recent attempts to improve the RCA process and to develop guidance for the creation of effective and sustainable solutions to be used by RCA teams.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-387
Number of pages7
JournalBMJ Quality and Safety
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Our current approach to root cause analysis: is it contributing to our failure to improve patient safety?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this