Outcomes of autologous versus synthetic inlay grafts after skull base reconstruction for high-flow defects: a multicenter case-control analysis

Theodore V. Nguyen, Arash Abiri, Victoria Idowu, Saawan Patel, Thomas Truong, David K. Lerner, Alan D. Workman, Pete S. Batra, Raewyn G. Campbell, John R. Craig, Dana L. Crosby, Jennifer E. Douglas, Jacob G. Eide, Michael A. Kohanski, Rijul S. Kshirsagar, Tran B. Locke, Peter Papagiannopoulos, Bobby A. Tajudeen, Charles C. L. Tong, Nithin D. AdappaJames N. Palmer, Edward C. Kuan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)441-444
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Forum of Allergy and Rhinology
Volume15
Issue number4
Early online date30 Dec 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2025

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2024. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • autologous graft
  • cerebrospinal fluid leak
  • dural substitute
  • nasoseptal flap
  • skull base reconstruction
  • synthetic grafts

Cite this