TY - JOUR
T1 - 'Overhaul Medicare and perhaps train us better'
T2 - a qualitative study of primary care general practitioners' perspectives on how to implement the low back pain clinical care standards
AU - Costa, Nathalia
AU - Lin, Chung-Wei Christine
AU - Blyth, Fiona
AU - Huckel-Schneider, Carmen
AU - Buchbinder, Rachelle
AU - Gnjidic, Danijela
AU - Langford, Aili
AU - O'Connor, Denise
AU - Schneider, Carl
AU - French, Simon
N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2025. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.
PY - 2025/7
Y1 - 2025/7
N2 - Introduction: In September 2022, the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare released the Low Back Pain Clinical Care Standards ('Care Standard'). We aimed to explore general practitioners' (GPs') perspectives on how the Care Standard can be implemented, with a view to identifying what strategies could be used to do so.Methods: This qualitative study is underpinned by a critical realist philosophy. We interviewed 16 GPs across Australia with experience working with patients who present with low back pain (LBP). Interview questions were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework, and interview data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.Results: We identified three themes: theme 1-'I have my own guidelines and ways of doing things'-guidelines and standards are not relevant for experienced GPs' captures the perceived unnecessariness of seeking advice from guidelines and standards for LBP; theme 2-I agree with the standards but the system, clinicians and patients hinder my ability to enact them-reports factors impacting the will and ability of clinicians to implement the standards in practice; theme 3-Change the system and train us better-discusses potential strategies to implement the Care Standard: changing funding and infrastructure (eg, improving GPs' reimbursement for time spent, investing in publicly funded allied health services); offering training and education (eg, continuing professional development courses, improving communication training in undergraduate courses), developing stakeholder relationships (eg, primary health networks, Health Pathways), supporting clinicians through interactive assistance (eg, reminders, embedding assessment tools in existing systems), engaging/educating patients and using evaluative strategies such as auditing.Conclusions: Our results suggest that the multidimensional nature of the challenges GPs face, and the strategies they suggest, calls for a multimodal and integrated approach to implementing the Care Standards, including system changes.
AB - Introduction: In September 2022, the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare released the Low Back Pain Clinical Care Standards ('Care Standard'). We aimed to explore general practitioners' (GPs') perspectives on how the Care Standard can be implemented, with a view to identifying what strategies could be used to do so.Methods: This qualitative study is underpinned by a critical realist philosophy. We interviewed 16 GPs across Australia with experience working with patients who present with low back pain (LBP). Interview questions were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework, and interview data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.Results: We identified three themes: theme 1-'I have my own guidelines and ways of doing things'-guidelines and standards are not relevant for experienced GPs' captures the perceived unnecessariness of seeking advice from guidelines and standards for LBP; theme 2-I agree with the standards but the system, clinicians and patients hinder my ability to enact them-reports factors impacting the will and ability of clinicians to implement the standards in practice; theme 3-Change the system and train us better-discusses potential strategies to implement the Care Standard: changing funding and infrastructure (eg, improving GPs' reimbursement for time spent, investing in publicly funded allied health services); offering training and education (eg, continuing professional development courses, improving communication training in undergraduate courses), developing stakeholder relationships (eg, primary health networks, Health Pathways), supporting clinicians through interactive assistance (eg, reminders, embedding assessment tools in existing systems), engaging/educating patients and using evaluative strategies such as auditing.Conclusions: Our results suggest that the multidimensional nature of the challenges GPs face, and the strategies they suggest, calls for a multimodal and integrated approach to implementing the Care Standards, including system changes.
UR - https://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1193939
UR - https://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1194483
UR - https://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/2025289
UR - https://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/2025661
U2 - 10.1136/bmjph-2025-002564
DO - 10.1136/bmjph-2025-002564
M3 - Article
C2 - 40937429
SN - 2753-4294
VL - 3
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - BMJ Public Health
JF - BMJ Public Health
IS - 2
M1 - e002564
ER -