Pacific labour mobility: will seasonal work programmes bear fruit?

Brian Opeskin, Therese MacDermott

Research output: Contribution to Newspaper/Magazine/WebsiteArticleResearch

Abstract

Compares Australia's pilot seasonal worker scheme with Kiribati, Tonga and Vanuatu, introduced Nov 2008, with NZ's Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE) scheme introduced Apr 2007. Assesses the success of the schemes, noting how they tend to favour the employment needs of the receiving nations rather than the development goals of the sending Pacific states.
LanguageEnglish
Pages25-25
No.16
Specialist publicationJust change
PublisherDev-Zone
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

labor mobility
fruit
need
programme

Cite this

@misc{693e176d095044fb861b03cb80179a34,
title = "Pacific labour mobility: will seasonal work programmes bear fruit?",
abstract = "Compares Australia's pilot seasonal worker scheme with Kiribati, Tonga and Vanuatu, introduced Nov 2008, with NZ's Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE) scheme introduced Apr 2007. Assesses the success of the schemes, noting how they tend to favour the employment needs of the receiving nations rather than the development goals of the sending Pacific states.",
author = "Brian Opeskin and Therese MacDermott",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
pages = "25--25",
journal = "Just change",
issn = "1178-3230",
publisher = "Dev-Zone",

}

Pacific labour mobility : will seasonal work programmes bear fruit? / Opeskin, Brian; MacDermott, Therese.

In: Just change, No. 16, 2009, p. 25-25.

Research output: Contribution to Newspaper/Magazine/WebsiteArticleResearch

TY - GEN

T1 - Pacific labour mobility

T2 - Just change

AU - Opeskin, Brian

AU - MacDermott, Therese

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Compares Australia's pilot seasonal worker scheme with Kiribati, Tonga and Vanuatu, introduced Nov 2008, with NZ's Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE) scheme introduced Apr 2007. Assesses the success of the schemes, noting how they tend to favour the employment needs of the receiving nations rather than the development goals of the sending Pacific states.

AB - Compares Australia's pilot seasonal worker scheme with Kiribati, Tonga and Vanuatu, introduced Nov 2008, with NZ's Recognised Seasonal Employer (RSE) scheme introduced Apr 2007. Assesses the success of the schemes, noting how they tend to favour the employment needs of the receiving nations rather than the development goals of the sending Pacific states.

M3 - Article

SP - 25

EP - 25

JO - Just change

JF - Just change

SN - 1178-3230

PB - Dev-Zone

ER -