Patients' preferred and perceived roles in making decisions about adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer

Erin Moth*, Sue Anne McLachlan, Anne Sophie Veillard, Nick Muljadi, Malcolm Hudson, Martin R. Stockler, Prunella Blinman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: People with cancer have varying preferences for involvement in decision-making between active, collaborative and passive roles. We sought the preferred and perceived involvement in decision-making among patients considering adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after resection of early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 

Methods: Patients considering ACT for NSCLC were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire at baseline and 6 months. Preferred and perceived decision-making roles were assessed by the Control Preferences Scale (CPS). We examined differences between preferred and perceived roles, differences in preferred roles over time, determinants of preferences, and differences in treatment preferences between patients preferring active and less active roles. 

Results: 98 patients completed the baseline questionnaire; 75 completed the 6 month questionnaire. Most patients were male (55%) with a median age of 64 years (range, 43-79 years). Preferred role in decision-making at baseline (n = 98) was active in 27%, collaborative in 47%, and passive in 27%. Perceived decision-making roles matched the preferred role in 79% of patients. Individuals' role preferences often varied between baseline and 6 months, but there was no consistent direction to the change (25% changed preference to more active involvement, 22% to less active). Preferring a more active role was associated with university education (OR 2.9, p = 0.02), deciding not to have ACT (OR 5.0, p < 0.01), and worse health-related quality of life (HRQL) during ACT: physical well-being (OR 4.4, p = 0.05), overall well-being (OR 5.5, p = 0.02), sleep (OR 8.4, p < 0.01) and shortness of breath (OR 7.6, p = 0.01). Patients who preferred an active decision-making role judged larger survival benefits necessary to make ACT worthwhile than those preferring a passive role. 

Conclusion: Most patients with resected NSCLC preferred and perceived a collaborative role in decision-making about ACT. Clinicians should elicit and consider patients' preferences for involvement in decision-making when discussing ACT for NSCLC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8-14
Number of pages7
JournalLung Cancer
Volume95
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Non-small-cell lung cancer
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy
  • Preferences
  • Decision-making

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patients' preferred and perceived roles in making decisions about adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this