Pelagic response of a humic lake to three years of phosphorus addition

Espen Donali*, Pål Brettum, Øyvind Kaste, Jarl Eivind Løvik, Anne Lyche-Solheim, Tom Andersen

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    6 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Three years of whole-lake phosphorus (P) fertilization, conducted in a 12-ha boreal forest lake, revealed significant changes in epilimnion nutrients, biomasses, and primary production. As a time average for all three treatment years, primary production increased 257% relative to the reference basin value of 16.5 mg·-3·day-1, whereas the carbon masses of both nanoalgae (>2 μm) and zooplankton increased roughly 130% from their initial values of 15 mg·m-3 and 17 mg·m -3, respectively. Calculated from a difference, the absolute increase in the sum of ciliates and picoplankton (heterotrophic bacteria and picoalgae) was more than six times as large as for algae larger than 2 μm, indicating that most added P ended in this compartment. Moreover, fertilization did not change the species inventory among nanoalgae and zooplankton, although the biomass composition changed somewhat. Only the former dominant species, the chrysophytes Dinobryon crenulatum, D. sociale v. americanum, Mallomonas allorgei, and Ochromonas sp. and the calanoid copepod Eudiaptomus gracilis increased substantially in biomass owing to the added P. Surprisingly, we observed a substantial delay in the food web response to fertilization, where most variables increased monotonously in size from year to year during the fertilization period. The underlying mechanisms for these delayed increases remains to be explained.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)322-332
    Number of pages11
    JournalCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
    Volume62
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2005

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Pelagic response of a humic lake to three years of phosphorus addition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this