Penile prosthesis no longer intervention of last resort for erectile dysfunction?

James Kovacic; Ankur Dhar; Andrew Shepherd; Ioana Popa; Amanda Chung

doi:10.1002/tre.912

Penile prosthesis no longer intervention of last resort for erectile dysfunction?

James Kovacic, Ankur Dhar, Andrew Shepherd, Ioana Popa, Amanda Chung

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction is more common than realised and can be the first indication of systemic disease. Penile prosthesis is a low-risk intervention with high patient satisfaction, previously deemed an endstage form of management. However, improvements in the devices and a recent American Association of Urology recommendation could change that.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	15-20
Number of pages	6
Journal	Trends in Urology & Mens Health
Volume	14
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/tre.912
Publication status	Published - May 2023

Access to Document

10.1002/tre.912

Cite this

@article{71a6473f8a544f489e605ae8f6feea48,

title = "Penile prosthesis no longer intervention of last resort for erectile dysfunction?",

abstract = "Erectile dysfunction is more common than realised and can be the first indication of systemic disease. Penile prosthesis is a low-risk intervention with high patient satisfaction, previously deemed an endstage form of management. However, improvements in the devices and a recent American Association of Urology recommendation could change that.",

author = "James Kovacic and Ankur Dhar and Andrew Shepherd and Ioana Popa and Amanda Chung",

year = "2023",

month = may,

doi = "10.1002/tre.912",

language = "English",

volume = "14",

pages = "15--20",

journal = "Trends in Urology & Mens Health",