Perceived barriers to adherence to breast cancer-related lymphoedema self-management

Jessica Alcorso, Kerry A. Sherman, Louise Koelmeyer, Helen Mackie, John Boyages

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Self-management is critical for the effective maintenance of breast-cancer related lymphoedema (BCRL), but levels of adherence are suboptimal. Aims: To compare the perceptions of lymphoedema therapists with those of women affected with BCRL regarding barriers to self-management. Methods: One-hundred-and-sixty-two women with breast cancer-related lymphoedema and 98 lymphoedema therapists were recruited. Participants completed an online survey assessing perceived barriers to adherence to lymphoedema self-management. Results: Multivariate analysis of variance indicated a significant difference between the extent to which therapists and affected women agreed that each of the seven perceived barriers negatively impact adherence. For each perceived barrier, therapists were more likely to agree that it negatively impacts adherence, while affected women were more likely to disagree that it negatively impacts adherence. Conclusion: The results suggest a need for improvements in communication between patients and care providers.

LanguageEnglish
Pages20-26
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Lymphoedema
Volume11
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Self Care
Lymphedema
Patient Care
Analysis of Variance
Multivariate Analysis
Communication
Maintenance
Breast Cancer Lymphedema

Keywords

  • lymphoedema
  • patient adherence
  • self-management
  • Self-management
  • breast cancer

Cite this

@article{ce755a4736ba49ea99e08cbd9f590ec2,
title = "Perceived barriers to adherence to breast cancer-related lymphoedema self-management",
abstract = "Background: Self-management is critical for the effective maintenance of breast-cancer related lymphoedema (BCRL), but levels of adherence are suboptimal. Aims: To compare the perceptions of lymphoedema therapists with those of women affected with BCRL regarding barriers to self-management. Methods: One-hundred-and-sixty-two women with breast cancer-related lymphoedema and 98 lymphoedema therapists were recruited. Participants completed an online survey assessing perceived barriers to adherence to lymphoedema self-management. Results: Multivariate analysis of variance indicated a significant difference between the extent to which therapists and affected women agreed that each of the seven perceived barriers negatively impact adherence. For each perceived barrier, therapists were more likely to agree that it negatively impacts adherence, while affected women were more likely to disagree that it negatively impacts adherence. Conclusion: The results suggest a need for improvements in communication between patients and care providers.",
keywords = "lymphoedema, patient adherence, self-management, Self-management, breast cancer",
author = "Jessica Alcorso and Sherman, {Kerry A.} and Louise Koelmeyer and Helen Mackie and John Boyages",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "20--26",
journal = "Journal of Lymphoedema",
issn = "1750-7235",
publisher = "Wounds UK",
number = "1",

}

Perceived barriers to adherence to breast cancer-related lymphoedema self-management. / Alcorso, Jessica; Sherman, Kerry A.; Koelmeyer, Louise; Mackie, Helen; Boyages, John.

In: Journal of Lymphoedema, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2016, p. 20-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceived barriers to adherence to breast cancer-related lymphoedema self-management

AU - Alcorso, Jessica

AU - Sherman, Kerry A.

AU - Koelmeyer, Louise

AU - Mackie, Helen

AU - Boyages, John

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Background: Self-management is critical for the effective maintenance of breast-cancer related lymphoedema (BCRL), but levels of adherence are suboptimal. Aims: To compare the perceptions of lymphoedema therapists with those of women affected with BCRL regarding barriers to self-management. Methods: One-hundred-and-sixty-two women with breast cancer-related lymphoedema and 98 lymphoedema therapists were recruited. Participants completed an online survey assessing perceived barriers to adherence to lymphoedema self-management. Results: Multivariate analysis of variance indicated a significant difference between the extent to which therapists and affected women agreed that each of the seven perceived barriers negatively impact adherence. For each perceived barrier, therapists were more likely to agree that it negatively impacts adherence, while affected women were more likely to disagree that it negatively impacts adherence. Conclusion: The results suggest a need for improvements in communication between patients and care providers.

AB - Background: Self-management is critical for the effective maintenance of breast-cancer related lymphoedema (BCRL), but levels of adherence are suboptimal. Aims: To compare the perceptions of lymphoedema therapists with those of women affected with BCRL regarding barriers to self-management. Methods: One-hundred-and-sixty-two women with breast cancer-related lymphoedema and 98 lymphoedema therapists were recruited. Participants completed an online survey assessing perceived barriers to adherence to lymphoedema self-management. Results: Multivariate analysis of variance indicated a significant difference between the extent to which therapists and affected women agreed that each of the seven perceived barriers negatively impact adherence. For each perceived barrier, therapists were more likely to agree that it negatively impacts adherence, while affected women were more likely to disagree that it negatively impacts adherence. Conclusion: The results suggest a need for improvements in communication between patients and care providers.

KW - lymphoedema

KW - patient adherence

KW - self-management

KW - Self-management

KW - breast cancer

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010369654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.journaloflymphoedema.com/archive/issue/11-1-2016

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 20

EP - 26

JO - Journal of Lymphoedema

T2 - Journal of Lymphoedema

JF - Journal of Lymphoedema

SN - 1750-7235

IS - 1

ER -