Perception, cognition, and delusion

Robert M. Ross; Ryan McKay; Max Coltheart; Robyn Langdon

doi:10.1017/S0140525X15002691

Perception, cognition, and delusion

Robert M. Ross^*, Ryan McKay, Max Coltheart, Robyn Langdon

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/opinion

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Firestone & Scholl’s (F&S) critique of putative empirical evidence for the cognitive penetrability of perception focuses on studies of neurologically normal populations. We suggest that a comprehensive exploration of the cognition–perception relationship also incorporate work on abnormal perception and cognition. We highlight the prominence of these issues in contemporary debates about the formation and maintenance of delusions.

Original language	English
Article number	e258
Pages (from-to)	47-48
Number of pages	2
Journal	Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume	39
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15002691
Publication status	Published - Jan 2016

Access to Document

10.1017/S0140525X15002691

Cite this

@article{238ff40c3b92453d89215981f041e5c3,

title = "Perception, cognition, and delusion",

abstract = "Firestone & Scholl{\textquoteright}s (F&S) critique of putative empirical evidence for the cognitive penetrability of perception focuses on studies of neurologically normal populations. We suggest that a comprehensive exploration of the cognition–perception relationship also incorporate work on abnormal perception and cognition. We highlight the prominence of these issues in contemporary debates about the formation and maintenance of delusions.",

author = "Ross, {Robert M.} and Ryan McKay and Max Coltheart and Robyn Langdon",

year = "2016",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1017/S0140525X15002691",

language = "English",

volume = "39",

pages = "47--48",

journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",

issn = "0140-525X",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press (CUP)",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perception, cognition, and delusion

AU - Ross, Robert M.

AU - McKay, Ryan

AU - Coltheart, Max

AU - Langdon, Robyn

PY - 2016/1

Y1 - 2016/1

N2 - Firestone & Scholl’s (F&S) critique of putative empirical evidence for the cognitive penetrability of perception focuses on studies of neurologically normal populations. We suggest that a comprehensive exploration of the cognition–perception relationship also incorporate work on abnormal perception and cognition. We highlight the prominence of these issues in contemporary debates about the formation and maintenance of delusions.

AB - Firestone & Scholl’s (F&S) critique of putative empirical evidence for the cognitive penetrability of perception focuses on studies of neurologically normal populations. We suggest that a comprehensive exploration of the cognition–perception relationship also incorporate work on abnormal perception and cognition. We highlight the prominence of these issues in contemporary debates about the formation and maintenance of delusions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045654214&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X15002691

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X15002691

M3 - Comment/opinion

C2 - 28355861

SN - 0140-525X

VL - 39

SP - 47

EP - 48

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

M1 - e258

ER -

Perception, cognition, and delusion

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this