Perceptions of Australian physiotherapy students about the potential implementation of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia: a national survey

Timothy David Noblet, John F. Marriott, Taryn Jones, Catherine Dean, Alison B. Rushton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the perceptions of Australian physiotherapy students about (1) the potential implementation and use of non-medical prescribing by physiotherapists in Australia and (2) how physiotherapist prescribing might impact the care that the physiotherapy profession can provide in the future. Design: A cross-sectional descriptive survey of physiotherapy students across Australia was completed using an online questionnaire developed by subject-experts and pretested (n=10) for internal consistency. A hyperlink to the questionnaire was emailed to all students enrolled in any accredited, entry-level Australian university physiotherapy programme. A reminder email was sent 4 weeks later. Setting: Participants completed an online questionnaire. Participants: 526 physiotherapy students from universities across all states with entry-level programmes. Outcome measures: Quantitative data underwent primary descriptive analysis. Thematic analysis was used to synthesise qualitative data. Results: 87% of participants supported the introduction of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia. 91% of participants stated that they would train to prescribe following introduction. Participants identified improvements in clinical and cost effectiveness, timely access to appropriate prescription medicines and optimisation of quality healthcare as key drivers for the introduction. Conclusions: Student physiotherapists support the introduction of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia, reporting potential benefits for patients, health services and the physiotherapy profession. Stakeholders should use the results of this study in conjunction with supporting literature to inform future decisions regarding physiotherapist prescribing in Australia.

LanguageEnglish
Article numbere026327
Pages1-10
Number of pages10
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 May 2019

Fingerprint

Physical Therapists
Students
Quality of Health Care
Health Services
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Prescriptions
Surveys and Questionnaires
Cross-Sectional Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2019. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Australia
  • non-medical prescribing
  • perceptions
  • physiotherapy
  • questionnaire
  • students
  • survey
  • views

Cite this

@article{202b819c4a4142dbaea9b89a62fafbb2,
title = "Perceptions of Australian physiotherapy students about the potential implementation of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia: a national survey",
abstract = "Objectives: To explore the perceptions of Australian physiotherapy students about (1) the potential implementation and use of non-medical prescribing by physiotherapists in Australia and (2) how physiotherapist prescribing might impact the care that the physiotherapy profession can provide in the future. Design: A cross-sectional descriptive survey of physiotherapy students across Australia was completed using an online questionnaire developed by subject-experts and pretested (n=10) for internal consistency. A hyperlink to the questionnaire was emailed to all students enrolled in any accredited, entry-level Australian university physiotherapy programme. A reminder email was sent 4 weeks later. Setting: Participants completed an online questionnaire. Participants: 526 physiotherapy students from universities across all states with entry-level programmes. Outcome measures: Quantitative data underwent primary descriptive analysis. Thematic analysis was used to synthesise qualitative data. Results: 87{\%} of participants supported the introduction of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia. 91{\%} of participants stated that they would train to prescribe following introduction. Participants identified improvements in clinical and cost effectiveness, timely access to appropriate prescription medicines and optimisation of quality healthcare as key drivers for the introduction. Conclusions: Student physiotherapists support the introduction of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia, reporting potential benefits for patients, health services and the physiotherapy profession. Stakeholders should use the results of this study in conjunction with supporting literature to inform future decisions regarding physiotherapist prescribing in Australia.",
keywords = "Australia, non-medical prescribing, perceptions, physiotherapy, questionnaire, students, survey, views",
author = "Noblet, {Timothy David} and Marriott, {John F.} and Taryn Jones and Catherine Dean and Rushton, {Alison B.}",
note = "Copyright the Author(s) 2019. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026327",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "British Medical Journal Publishing Group",
number = "5",

}

Perceptions of Australian physiotherapy students about the potential implementation of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia : a national survey. / Noblet, Timothy David; Marriott, John F.; Jones, Taryn; Dean, Catherine; Rushton, Alison B.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 9, No. 5, e026327, 17.05.2019, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of Australian physiotherapy students about the potential implementation of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia

T2 - BMJ Open

AU - Noblet, Timothy David

AU - Marriott, John F.

AU - Jones, Taryn

AU - Dean, Catherine

AU - Rushton, Alison B.

N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2019. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2019/5/17

Y1 - 2019/5/17

N2 - Objectives: To explore the perceptions of Australian physiotherapy students about (1) the potential implementation and use of non-medical prescribing by physiotherapists in Australia and (2) how physiotherapist prescribing might impact the care that the physiotherapy profession can provide in the future. Design: A cross-sectional descriptive survey of physiotherapy students across Australia was completed using an online questionnaire developed by subject-experts and pretested (n=10) for internal consistency. A hyperlink to the questionnaire was emailed to all students enrolled in any accredited, entry-level Australian university physiotherapy programme. A reminder email was sent 4 weeks later. Setting: Participants completed an online questionnaire. Participants: 526 physiotherapy students from universities across all states with entry-level programmes. Outcome measures: Quantitative data underwent primary descriptive analysis. Thematic analysis was used to synthesise qualitative data. Results: 87% of participants supported the introduction of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia. 91% of participants stated that they would train to prescribe following introduction. Participants identified improvements in clinical and cost effectiveness, timely access to appropriate prescription medicines and optimisation of quality healthcare as key drivers for the introduction. Conclusions: Student physiotherapists support the introduction of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia, reporting potential benefits for patients, health services and the physiotherapy profession. Stakeholders should use the results of this study in conjunction with supporting literature to inform future decisions regarding physiotherapist prescribing in Australia.

AB - Objectives: To explore the perceptions of Australian physiotherapy students about (1) the potential implementation and use of non-medical prescribing by physiotherapists in Australia and (2) how physiotherapist prescribing might impact the care that the physiotherapy profession can provide in the future. Design: A cross-sectional descriptive survey of physiotherapy students across Australia was completed using an online questionnaire developed by subject-experts and pretested (n=10) for internal consistency. A hyperlink to the questionnaire was emailed to all students enrolled in any accredited, entry-level Australian university physiotherapy programme. A reminder email was sent 4 weeks later. Setting: Participants completed an online questionnaire. Participants: 526 physiotherapy students from universities across all states with entry-level programmes. Outcome measures: Quantitative data underwent primary descriptive analysis. Thematic analysis was used to synthesise qualitative data. Results: 87% of participants supported the introduction of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia. 91% of participants stated that they would train to prescribe following introduction. Participants identified improvements in clinical and cost effectiveness, timely access to appropriate prescription medicines and optimisation of quality healthcare as key drivers for the introduction. Conclusions: Student physiotherapists support the introduction of physiotherapist prescribing in Australia, reporting potential benefits for patients, health services and the physiotherapy profession. Stakeholders should use the results of this study in conjunction with supporting literature to inform future decisions regarding physiotherapist prescribing in Australia.

KW - Australia

KW - non-medical prescribing

KW - perceptions

KW - physiotherapy

KW - questionnaire

KW - students

KW - survey

KW - views

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065982744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026327

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026327

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 5

M1 - e026327

ER -