Perceptions of resource users and managers towards fisheries management options in Kenyan coral reefs

T. R. McClanahan, J. Maina, J. Davies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The perceptions of Kenyan resource users and managers towards gear and area management were examine through face-to-face interviews to identify areas of agreement and disagreement and compare with compliance. Opinions were sought about gears that sustained fish catch, gears discouraged by the government and traditional leaders, and the benefits of area management were sought. There was good agreement among most groups and traditional leaders about the gears discouraged by government, with beach seines and spear guns the most commonly listed. This indicates good agreement between government and traditions, promoted by recent government legislation, but compliance was poor since nearly two-thirds of fishers used these recently prohibited gears. This was due, in part, to lesser agreement concerning gears that promote a sustainable fishery, with spear guns and beach seines scaled low, but moderately supported in this respect by those fishers that use these gears. These gears persist because of the lack of shared evidence about the yields and sustainability of the various gears and social and economic aspects, such as increased competitiveness and decreased costs of the gears. There is evidence that beach seines lower yields but this gear persists because it is more competitive and has lower costs to the user than the other gears. Spear guns also persist because young and poor fishermen, who cannot afford costs associated with other gears, use them. Government employees scaled the benefits of area, and particularly closed area, management, higher than fishers, which is an issue of conflict but, nonetheless, has good compliance because of the long history of closed area management. For both types of management, shared perceptions alone were insufficient to achieve high compliance, and active enabling and enforcement by managers is needed.

LanguageEnglish
Pages105-112
Number of pages8
JournalFisheries Management and Ecology
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

fishery management
fisheries management
coral reefs
coral reef
managers
compliance
resource
beach
cost
beaches
competitiveness
legislation
fishery
sustainability
fish
history
economics
fishermen
laws and regulations
human resources

Keywords

  • Area management
  • Artisanal fishing
  • Attitudinal survey
  • Gear management
  • Marine parks

Cite this

@article{95ce9bf192f446b4a2daa7d36b02186a,
title = "Perceptions of resource users and managers towards fisheries management options in Kenyan coral reefs",
abstract = "The perceptions of Kenyan resource users and managers towards gear and area management were examine through face-to-face interviews to identify areas of agreement and disagreement and compare with compliance. Opinions were sought about gears that sustained fish catch, gears discouraged by the government and traditional leaders, and the benefits of area management were sought. There was good agreement among most groups and traditional leaders about the gears discouraged by government, with beach seines and spear guns the most commonly listed. This indicates good agreement between government and traditions, promoted by recent government legislation, but compliance was poor since nearly two-thirds of fishers used these recently prohibited gears. This was due, in part, to lesser agreement concerning gears that promote a sustainable fishery, with spear guns and beach seines scaled low, but moderately supported in this respect by those fishers that use these gears. These gears persist because of the lack of shared evidence about the yields and sustainability of the various gears and social and economic aspects, such as increased competitiveness and decreased costs of the gears. There is evidence that beach seines lower yields but this gear persists because it is more competitive and has lower costs to the user than the other gears. Spear guns also persist because young and poor fishermen, who cannot afford costs associated with other gears, use them. Government employees scaled the benefits of area, and particularly closed area, management, higher than fishers, which is an issue of conflict but, nonetheless, has good compliance because of the long history of closed area management. For both types of management, shared perceptions alone were insufficient to achieve high compliance, and active enabling and enforcement by managers is needed.",
keywords = "Area management, Artisanal fishing, Attitudinal survey, Gear management, Marine parks",
author = "McClanahan, {T. R.} and J. Maina and J. Davies",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2400.2004.00431.x",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "105--112",
journal = "Fisheries Management and Ecology",
issn = "0969-997X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",
number = "2",

}

Perceptions of resource users and managers towards fisheries management options in Kenyan coral reefs. / McClanahan, T. R.; Maina, J.; Davies, J.

In: Fisheries Management and Ecology, Vol. 12, No. 2, 04.2005, p. 105-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptions of resource users and managers towards fisheries management options in Kenyan coral reefs

AU - McClanahan, T. R.

AU - Maina, J.

AU - Davies, J.

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - The perceptions of Kenyan resource users and managers towards gear and area management were examine through face-to-face interviews to identify areas of agreement and disagreement and compare with compliance. Opinions were sought about gears that sustained fish catch, gears discouraged by the government and traditional leaders, and the benefits of area management were sought. There was good agreement among most groups and traditional leaders about the gears discouraged by government, with beach seines and spear guns the most commonly listed. This indicates good agreement between government and traditions, promoted by recent government legislation, but compliance was poor since nearly two-thirds of fishers used these recently prohibited gears. This was due, in part, to lesser agreement concerning gears that promote a sustainable fishery, with spear guns and beach seines scaled low, but moderately supported in this respect by those fishers that use these gears. These gears persist because of the lack of shared evidence about the yields and sustainability of the various gears and social and economic aspects, such as increased competitiveness and decreased costs of the gears. There is evidence that beach seines lower yields but this gear persists because it is more competitive and has lower costs to the user than the other gears. Spear guns also persist because young and poor fishermen, who cannot afford costs associated with other gears, use them. Government employees scaled the benefits of area, and particularly closed area, management, higher than fishers, which is an issue of conflict but, nonetheless, has good compliance because of the long history of closed area management. For both types of management, shared perceptions alone were insufficient to achieve high compliance, and active enabling and enforcement by managers is needed.

AB - The perceptions of Kenyan resource users and managers towards gear and area management were examine through face-to-face interviews to identify areas of agreement and disagreement and compare with compliance. Opinions were sought about gears that sustained fish catch, gears discouraged by the government and traditional leaders, and the benefits of area management were sought. There was good agreement among most groups and traditional leaders about the gears discouraged by government, with beach seines and spear guns the most commonly listed. This indicates good agreement between government and traditions, promoted by recent government legislation, but compliance was poor since nearly two-thirds of fishers used these recently prohibited gears. This was due, in part, to lesser agreement concerning gears that promote a sustainable fishery, with spear guns and beach seines scaled low, but moderately supported in this respect by those fishers that use these gears. These gears persist because of the lack of shared evidence about the yields and sustainability of the various gears and social and economic aspects, such as increased competitiveness and decreased costs of the gears. There is evidence that beach seines lower yields but this gear persists because it is more competitive and has lower costs to the user than the other gears. Spear guns also persist because young and poor fishermen, who cannot afford costs associated with other gears, use them. Government employees scaled the benefits of area, and particularly closed area, management, higher than fishers, which is an issue of conflict but, nonetheless, has good compliance because of the long history of closed area management. For both types of management, shared perceptions alone were insufficient to achieve high compliance, and active enabling and enforcement by managers is needed.

KW - Area management

KW - Artisanal fishing

KW - Attitudinal survey

KW - Gear management

KW - Marine parks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=16344387023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2004.00431.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2004.00431.x

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 105

EP - 112

JO - Fisheries Management and Ecology

T2 - Fisheries Management and Ecology

JF - Fisheries Management and Ecology

SN - 0969-997X

IS - 2

ER -