Perceptual assimilation of lexical tone: the roles of language experience and visual information

Amanda Reid, Denis Burnham, Benjawan Kasisopa, Ronan Reilly, Virginie Attina, Nan Xu Rattanasone, Catherine T. Best

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Using Best’s (1995) perceptual assimilation model (PAM), we investigated auditory–visual (AV), auditory-only (AO), and visual-only (VO) perception of Thai tones. Mandarin and Cantonese (tone-language) speakers were asked to categorize Thai tones according to their own native tone categories, and Australian English (non-tone-language) speakers to categorize Thai tones into their native intonation categories—for instance, question or statement. As comparisons, Thai participants completed a straightforward identification task, and another Australian English group identified the Thai tones using simple symbols. All of the groups also completed an AX discrimination task. Both the Mandarin and Cantonese groups categorized AO and AV Thai falling tones as their native level tones, and Thai rising tones as their native rising tones, although the Mandarin participants found it easier to categorize Thai level tones than did the Cantonese participants. VO information led to very poor categorization for all groups, and AO and AV information also led to very poor categorizations for the English intonation categorization group. PAM’s predictions regarding tone discriminability based on these category assimilation patterns were borne out for the Mandarin group’s AO and AV discriminations, providing support for the applicability of the PAM to lexical tones. For the Cantonese group, however, PAM was unable to account for one specific discrimination pattern—namely, their relatively good performance on the Thai high–rising contrast in the auditory conditions—and no predictions could be derived for the English groups. A full account of tone assimilation will likely need to incorporate considerations of phonetic, and even acoustic, similarity and overlap between nonnative and native tone categories.
LanguageEnglish
Pages571-591
Number of pages21
JournalAttention, Perception and Psychophysics
Volume77
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Language
Accidental Falls
Visual Perception
Phonetics
Acoustics
Discrimination (Psychology)

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2014. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Lexical tones
  • Nonnative speech perception
  • Perceptual assimilation model
  • Auditory–visual speech

Cite this

Reid, Amanda ; Burnham, Denis ; Kasisopa, Benjawan ; Reilly, Ronan ; Attina, Virginie ; Xu Rattanasone, Nan ; Best, Catherine T. / Perceptual assimilation of lexical tone : the roles of language experience and visual information. In: Attention, Perception and Psychophysics. 2015 ; Vol. 77, No. 2. pp. 571-591.
@article{5e1eb97476f0461eb9a086cb426887c2,
title = "Perceptual assimilation of lexical tone: the roles of language experience and visual information",
abstract = "Using Best’s (1995) perceptual assimilation model (PAM), we investigated auditory–visual (AV), auditory-only (AO), and visual-only (VO) perception of Thai tones. Mandarin and Cantonese (tone-language) speakers were asked to categorize Thai tones according to their own native tone categories, and Australian English (non-tone-language) speakers to categorize Thai tones into their native intonation categories—for instance, question or statement. As comparisons, Thai participants completed a straightforward identification task, and another Australian English group identified the Thai tones using simple symbols. All of the groups also completed an AX discrimination task. Both the Mandarin and Cantonese groups categorized AO and AV Thai falling tones as their native level tones, and Thai rising tones as their native rising tones, although the Mandarin participants found it easier to categorize Thai level tones than did the Cantonese participants. VO information led to very poor categorization for all groups, and AO and AV information also led to very poor categorizations for the English intonation categorization group. PAM’s predictions regarding tone discriminability based on these category assimilation patterns were borne out for the Mandarin group’s AO and AV discriminations, providing support for the applicability of the PAM to lexical tones. For the Cantonese group, however, PAM was unable to account for one specific discrimination pattern—namely, their relatively good performance on the Thai high–rising contrast in the auditory conditions—and no predictions could be derived for the English groups. A full account of tone assimilation will likely need to incorporate considerations of phonetic, and even acoustic, similarity and overlap between nonnative and native tone categories.",
keywords = "Lexical tones, Nonnative speech perception, Perceptual assimilation model, Auditory–visual speech",
author = "Amanda Reid and Denis Burnham and Benjawan Kasisopa and Ronan Reilly and Virginie Attina and {Xu Rattanasone}, Nan and Best, {Catherine T.}",
note = "Copyright the Author(s) 2014. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.3758/s13414-014-0791-3",
language = "English",
volume = "77",
pages = "571--591",
journal = "Attention, Perception and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-393X",
publisher = "Springer, Springer Nature",
number = "2",

}

Perceptual assimilation of lexical tone : the roles of language experience and visual information. / Reid, Amanda; Burnham, Denis; Kasisopa, Benjawan; Reilly, Ronan; Attina, Virginie; Xu Rattanasone, Nan; Best, Catherine T.

In: Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, Vol. 77, No. 2, 2015, p. 571-591.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceptual assimilation of lexical tone

T2 - Attention, Perception and Psychophysics

AU - Reid, Amanda

AU - Burnham, Denis

AU - Kasisopa, Benjawan

AU - Reilly, Ronan

AU - Attina, Virginie

AU - Xu Rattanasone, Nan

AU - Best, Catherine T.

N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2014. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Using Best’s (1995) perceptual assimilation model (PAM), we investigated auditory–visual (AV), auditory-only (AO), and visual-only (VO) perception of Thai tones. Mandarin and Cantonese (tone-language) speakers were asked to categorize Thai tones according to their own native tone categories, and Australian English (non-tone-language) speakers to categorize Thai tones into their native intonation categories—for instance, question or statement. As comparisons, Thai participants completed a straightforward identification task, and another Australian English group identified the Thai tones using simple symbols. All of the groups also completed an AX discrimination task. Both the Mandarin and Cantonese groups categorized AO and AV Thai falling tones as their native level tones, and Thai rising tones as their native rising tones, although the Mandarin participants found it easier to categorize Thai level tones than did the Cantonese participants. VO information led to very poor categorization for all groups, and AO and AV information also led to very poor categorizations for the English intonation categorization group. PAM’s predictions regarding tone discriminability based on these category assimilation patterns were borne out for the Mandarin group’s AO and AV discriminations, providing support for the applicability of the PAM to lexical tones. For the Cantonese group, however, PAM was unable to account for one specific discrimination pattern—namely, their relatively good performance on the Thai high–rising contrast in the auditory conditions—and no predictions could be derived for the English groups. A full account of tone assimilation will likely need to incorporate considerations of phonetic, and even acoustic, similarity and overlap between nonnative and native tone categories.

AB - Using Best’s (1995) perceptual assimilation model (PAM), we investigated auditory–visual (AV), auditory-only (AO), and visual-only (VO) perception of Thai tones. Mandarin and Cantonese (tone-language) speakers were asked to categorize Thai tones according to their own native tone categories, and Australian English (non-tone-language) speakers to categorize Thai tones into their native intonation categories—for instance, question or statement. As comparisons, Thai participants completed a straightforward identification task, and another Australian English group identified the Thai tones using simple symbols. All of the groups also completed an AX discrimination task. Both the Mandarin and Cantonese groups categorized AO and AV Thai falling tones as their native level tones, and Thai rising tones as their native rising tones, although the Mandarin participants found it easier to categorize Thai level tones than did the Cantonese participants. VO information led to very poor categorization for all groups, and AO and AV information also led to very poor categorizations for the English intonation categorization group. PAM’s predictions regarding tone discriminability based on these category assimilation patterns were borne out for the Mandarin group’s AO and AV discriminations, providing support for the applicability of the PAM to lexical tones. For the Cantonese group, however, PAM was unable to account for one specific discrimination pattern—namely, their relatively good performance on the Thai high–rising contrast in the auditory conditions—and no predictions could be derived for the English groups. A full account of tone assimilation will likely need to incorporate considerations of phonetic, and even acoustic, similarity and overlap between nonnative and native tone categories.

KW - Lexical tones

KW - Nonnative speech perception

KW - Perceptual assimilation model

KW - Auditory–visual speech

U2 - 10.3758/s13414-014-0791-3

DO - 10.3758/s13414-014-0791-3

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 571

EP - 591

JO - Attention, Perception and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-393X

IS - 2

ER -