Perceptual grouping in two visually reliant species: Humans (Homo sapiens) and Australian sea lions (Neophoca cinerea)

Darren Burke*, Paul Everingham, Tracey Rogers, Melinda Hinton, Sophie Hall-Aspland

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    12 Citations (Scopus)


    Kurylo, van Nest, and Knepper (1997 Journal of Comparative Psychology 111 126-134) have recently shown that hooded rats are able to judge the global orientation of an array of elements if orientation is signalled by the perceptual-grouping principle of proximity, but not if it is signalled by element alignment. Using a procedure designed to overcome some potential problems with the experiment of Kurylo et al, we found the same distinction in the perceptual processing of Australian sea lions. The sea lions were able to judge the orientation of arrays containing strong proximity and similarity information, but performed at chance levels judging arrays in which element alignment signalled global orientation. Human subjects were able to judge all three pattern types quickly and accurately. This is strong evidence of a qualitative distinction in the way in which perceptual grouping operates in humans and the non-human species tested. Whether this distinction is a consequence of evolutionary or experiential factors is a question for future research, but the mere fact of a qualitative difference holds important implications for our understanding of perceptual grouping.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1093-1106
    Number of pages14
    Issue number9
    Publication statusPublished - 2001


    Dive into the research topics of 'Perceptual grouping in two visually reliant species: Humans (Homo sapiens) and Australian sea lions (Neophoca cinerea)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this