Performance evaluation of CMIP6 models for application to hydrological modelling studies – a case study of Australia

[Graphical abstract presents]

Accurate estimation of climate change impacts on catchment hydrology is essential for effective future water management. The efficacy of such estimations is dependent on proper climate model selection. In this study, an attempt was made to formulate a methodology for climate model selection, evaluating eight climate models from the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6). The models were assessed for their ability to simulate variables used in hydrological studies and large-scale atmospheric circulation influencing rainfall in Australia. Five statistical indicators Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Spatial Correlation (SC), Percentage Bias (Pbias), Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE), and Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) were used to evaluate the performance, and the models were ranked through Compromise Programming (CP), a multiple criteria decision making technique. Results show that HadGEM3-GC31-LL performed well in most of the categories considered and was top top-ranked model overall followed by GFDL-ESM4, CESM2-CAM6-RT, and CanESM5 for Australia. Conversely, MIROC6 consistently ranked lower in most of the categories. In the context of simulating hydrological variables, CESM2-CAM6-RT, HadGEM3-GC31-LL, and GFDL-ESM4 emerged as the top three models. The robustness of the proposed methodology suggests its applicability for model selection, making it a replicable approach for climate change impact assessment studies in diverse regions.