Personal memory, the scaffolded mind, and cognitive change in the Neolithic

John Sutton*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    ‘The Çatalhöyük evidence as a whole’, write Hodder and Pels, ‘gives many indications that, indeed, people began to link themselves to specific pasts, by burying pots, tools, humans and hunting trophies in ways that indicate particular memories rather than a generic reference to a group’ (2010, 182). Hodder draws on his multidisciplinary team’s impressive studies of a wide range of artifacts and practices - household symbols, pit-digging, burial, figurines, tools, decoration, and more - to argue that forms of remembering emerged or consolidated at Çatalhöyük that were neither merely routinized and habitual, nor merely traditional and generic, and that took as their objects neither repeated activities nor widespread factual knowledge. Rather, the new forms of social memory being constructed at Çatalhöyük were ‘conscious, specific, and commemorative’, as household groups ‘began to make specific connections between the present and the past’ (Hodder & Cessford 2004, 35; Hodder 2006, 143).

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationConsciousness, creativity, and self at the dawn of settled life
    EditorsIan Hodder
    Place of PublicationCambridge, UK
    PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
    Chapter10
    Pages209-229
    Number of pages21
    ISBN (Electronic)9781108753616
    ISBN (Print)9781108484923
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Personal memory, the scaffolded mind, and cognitive change in the Neolithic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this