Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Phenomenology and delusions: Who put the 'alien' in alien control?

Elisabeth Pacherie*, Melissa Green, Tim Bayne

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Although current models of delusion converge in proposing that delusions are based on unusual experiences, they differ in the role that they accord experience in the formation of delusions. On some accounts, the experience comprises the very content of the delusion, whereas on other accounts the delusion is adopted in an attempt to explain an unusual experience. We call these the endorsement and explanationist models, respectively. We examine the debate between endorsement and explanationist models with respect to the 'alien control' delusion. People with delusions of alien control believe that their actions and/or thoughts are being controlled by an external agent. Some accounts of alien control (e.g., Frith, Blakemore, & Wolpert, 2000a) are best thought of in explanationist terms; other accounts (e.g., Jeannerod, 1999) seem more suited to an endorsement approach. We argue that recent cognitive and neurophysiological evidence favours an endorsement model of the delusion of alien control.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)566-577
    Number of pages12
    JournalConsciousness and cognition
    Volume15
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Phenomenology and delusions: Who put the 'alien' in alien control?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this