Phonological decoding and morpho-orthographic decomposition: complementary routes during learning to read

Brice Brossette*, Élise Lefèvre, Elisabeth Beyersmann, Eddy Cavalli, Jonathan Grainger, Bernard Lété

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We examined the reliance on phonological decoding and morpho-orthographic decomposition strategies in developing and skilled readers of French. A lexical decision experiment was conducted where the critical stimuli were four types of nonwords, all derived from the same base word, such as the French word visage (face) in the following examples: (a) pseudo-homophone (PsH) nonwords (e.g., visaje), (b) orthographic controls for PsH nonwords (e.g., visape), (c) pseudo-morphemic (PsM) nonwords (e.g., visageable), and (d) orthographic controls for PsM nonwords (e.g., visagealle, where alle is not a suffix in French). Responses to PsH and PsM nonwords and their controls were studied in three groups of school children (Grades 1, 2, and 5) and one group of skilled adult readers. PsH interference effects (i.e., more errors to PsH nonwords than to the corresponding controls) decreased during reading acquisition to become nonsignificant in skilled readers. Interestingly, the opposite pattern was seen in PsM interference effects (also measured in terms of accuracy), which were already significant in Grade 1 and increased during reading development to reach their maximum in skilled readers. These results point toward opposing learning trajectories in the use of phonological and morphological information when learning to silently read for meaning.

Original languageEnglish
Article number105877
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Experimental Child Psychology
Volume242
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

Keywords

  • phonology
  • morphology
  • reading acquisition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phonological decoding and morpho-orthographic decomposition: complementary routes during learning to read'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this