TY - JOUR
T1 - Phonological variation and change in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages
T2 - The location variable
AU - Schembri, Adam
AU - McKee, David
AU - McKee, Rachel
AU - Pivac, Sara
AU - Johnston, Trevor
AU - Goswell, Della
N1 - Copyright 2009 Cambridge University Press. Article originally published in Language Variation and Change, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp. 193-231. The original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954394509990081.
PY - 2009/7
Y1 - 2009/7
N2 - In this study, we consider variation in a class of signs in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages that includes the signs think, name, and clever. In their citation form, these signs are specified for a place of articulation at or near the signer's forehead or above, but are sometimes produced at lower locations. An analysis of 2667 tokens collected from 205 deaf signers in five sites across Australia and of 2096 tokens collected from 138 deaf signers from three regions in New Zealand indicates that location variation in these signs reflects both linguistic and social factors, as also reported for American Sign Language (Lucas, Bayley, & Valli, 2001). Despite similarities, however, we find that some of the particular factors at work, and the kinds of influence they have, appear to differ in these three signed languages. Moreover, our results suggest that lexical frequency may also play a role.
AB - In this study, we consider variation in a class of signs in Australian and New Zealand Sign Languages that includes the signs think, name, and clever. In their citation form, these signs are specified for a place of articulation at or near the signer's forehead or above, but are sometimes produced at lower locations. An analysis of 2667 tokens collected from 205 deaf signers in five sites across Australia and of 2096 tokens collected from 138 deaf signers from three regions in New Zealand indicates that location variation in these signs reflects both linguistic and social factors, as also reported for American Sign Language (Lucas, Bayley, & Valli, 2001). Despite similarities, however, we find that some of the particular factors at work, and the kinds of influence they have, appear to differ in these three signed languages. Moreover, our results suggest that lexical frequency may also play a role.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=74349131493&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0954394509990081
DO - 10.1017/S0954394509990081
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:74349131493
VL - 21
SP - 193
EP - 231
JO - Language Variation and Change
JF - Language Variation and Change
SN - 0954-3945
IS - 2
ER -