Physical cues of partner quality

Ian D. Stephen, Severi Luoto

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The dominant evolutionary theory of sexual attraction posits that attraction serves as a psychobehavioral and motivational mechanism for identifying healthy, fertile, and appropriate mates. According to this theory, humans and animals display cues that reflect their mate quality and, if successful, are perceived as attractive by potential mates. There is evidence for such valid cues in human faces, bodies, and non-bodily traits, which include adornments and items that signal provisioning ability, creativity, artistic skills, or conspicuous consumption. In this chapter, we discuss the evidence for the existence of these facial, bodily, and non-bodily cues and for their role in communicating aspects of partner quality, including health, fertility, developmental stability, genetic quality, and potential for parental investment. We further discuss sex differences in the physical cues that men and women rely on in mate choice. We conclude by highlighting the centrality and evolutionary importance of physical cues in contemporary sexual selection, and how they manifest in evolutionarily novel inventions such as physical self-enhancements, “sexy selfies,” social media, and online dating.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology and romantic relationships
EditorsJustin K. Mogilski, Todd K. Shackelford
Place of PublicationNew York, NY
PublisherOxford University Press
Chapter2
Pages42-73
Number of pages32
ISBN (Electronic)9780197524749
ISBN (Print)9780197524718
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameOxford library of psychology series

Keywords

  • attraction
  • beauty
  • creativity
  • evolution
  • health cues
  • mate choice
  • non-bodily ornaments
  • physical attractiveness
  • sexual selection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Physical cues of partner quality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this