TY - JOUR
T1 - Physical harms associated with suprascapular nerve block interventions in the non-surgical management of acute and chronic shoulder pain
T2 - a systematic review
AU - Annison, David Richard
AU - Smith, Neil
AU - Salt, Emma
AU - Noblet, Tim
AU - Rangan, Amar
AU - McDaid, Catriona
PY - 2024/6/3
Y1 - 2024/6/3
N2 - Background: The utility of the suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) in the non-surgical management of shoulder pain continues to be explored, whilst its associated physical harms have not. This systematic review aims to report the physical harms associated with the SSNB in the non-surgical management of shoulder pain. Methods: A search was undertaken of AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, Pubmed, and Scopus databases. Studies were included if they reported the presence or absence of harm following a SSNB intervention (injection, pulsed radiofrequency, ablation) in the non-surgical management of acute or chronic shoulder pain. Excluded studies were those which utilised SSNB for peri, intra, or post-surgical intervention. The McMaster tool for assessing quality of harms assessment and reporting was utilised. Results: A total of 111 studies were included in this review of which 168 episodes of harm were reported across 4142 participants. Harm severity ranged from pneumothorax (n = 5) to local pain and bruising (n = 50). The quality of harms assessment and reporting across all studies was poor. Discussion: Despite heterogeneity in SSNB intervention, and low-quality evidence, SSNB carries a low risk of physical harm. Further work is needed in addressing the poor quality of harms assessment and reporting in SSNB studies.
AB - Background: The utility of the suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) in the non-surgical management of shoulder pain continues to be explored, whilst its associated physical harms have not. This systematic review aims to report the physical harms associated with the SSNB in the non-surgical management of shoulder pain. Methods: A search was undertaken of AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, Pubmed, and Scopus databases. Studies were included if they reported the presence or absence of harm following a SSNB intervention (injection, pulsed radiofrequency, ablation) in the non-surgical management of acute or chronic shoulder pain. Excluded studies were those which utilised SSNB for peri, intra, or post-surgical intervention. The McMaster tool for assessing quality of harms assessment and reporting was utilised. Results: A total of 111 studies were included in this review of which 168 episodes of harm were reported across 4142 participants. Harm severity ranged from pneumothorax (n = 5) to local pain and bruising (n = 50). The quality of harms assessment and reporting across all studies was poor. Discussion: Despite heterogeneity in SSNB intervention, and low-quality evidence, SSNB carries a low risk of physical harm. Further work is needed in addressing the poor quality of harms assessment and reporting in SSNB studies.
KW - adverse effects
KW - adverse events
KW - harm
KW - safety
KW - shoulder pain
KW - suprascapular nerve block
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85195490965&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/17585732241255679
DO - 10.1177/17585732241255679
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39552675
AN - SCOPUS:85195490965
SN - 1758-5732
JO - Shoulder and Elbow
JF - Shoulder and Elbow
ER -