Physical properties of root cementum

Part 3. Hardness and elastic modulus after application of light and heavy forces

Pennapa Srivicharnkul, Om Prakash Kharbanda, Michael V. Swain, Peter Petocz, M. Ali Darendeliler*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    34 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: The aims of this investigation were to evaluate the hardness and elastic modulus of untreated human premolar cementum and to investigate the changes after application of light and heavy orthodontic forces. Methods: Thirty-six maxillary and mandibular first premolars were collected from 16 prospective orthodontic patients. The patients were assigned to 1 of 2 groups. Group I (light force) consisted of 8 subjects (4 male, 4 female, mean age 14.8 years) who had 25 g of buccally directed orthodontic force applied to the first premolars on 1 side. Group II (heavy force) consisted of 9 subjects (7 male, 2 female, mean age 13.8 years) who had 225 g of buccally directed orthodontic force applied to first premolars on 1 side. Contralateral premolars served as the control in both groups. The force was applied for 4 weeks; then each first premolar was extracted and stored in deionized water. Physical properties were tested on unprepared cementum on buccal and lingual surfaces at the cervical, middle, and apical thirds with an ultra-micro-indentation system. Results: Mean (± standard deviation) hardness of the untreated cementum at the cervical, middle, and apical thirds, respectively, was 0.25 ± 0.09 GPa, 0.24 ± 0.07 GPa, and 0.18 ± 0.06 GPa on the buccal surface and 0.24 ± 0.08 GPa, 0.24 ± 0.06 GPa, and 0.21 ± 0.06 GPa on the lingual surface. Mean elastic modulus at the cervical, middle, and apical thirds, respectively, was 4.4 ± 2.4 GPa, 3.4 ± 2.0 GPa, and 2.4 ± 1.8GPa on the buccal surface and 3.8 ± 2.1 GPa, 3.2 ± 1.4 GPa, and 2.4 ± 1.5 GPa on the lingual surface. Conclusions: The mean hardness and elastic modulus of untreated human premolar cementum gradually decreased from cervical to apical regions of the buccal and lingual surfaces. A similar decrease was observed in the experimental teeth of light-force and heavy-force groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the control and experimental teeth; this is probably due to large intraindividual variation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)168-176
    Number of pages9
    JournalAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
    Volume127
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2005

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Physical properties of root cementum: Part 3. Hardness and elastic modulus after application of light and heavy forces'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this