Pigs in space1: How we recognize rotated objects

Michael Corballis, Branka Milivojevic, Irina Harris

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    As organisms that move freely in space, we are adept at visually recognising objects regardless of their orientations. This facility probably does not depend on a correction mechanism, such as mental rotation, that might render an object in some canonical orientation. Rather, it is likely that an orientation-free description is extracted, probably by the ventral visual system. This suggests further that we can recognize the identity of an object before we can determine its orientation in space. This may depend in turn on the integration of shape information extracted by the ventral system with information about the space-occupying property of the object extracted by the dorsal system. The dissociation between identity and orientation may explain cases of orientation agnosia, in which the patient can recognize common objects but cannot determine their orientations. Orientation-free descriptions are nevertheless relatively crude. In order to distinguish between shapes that differ in more subtle ways, such as individual faces, or between shapes that are mirror-images of one another, a correction may be necessary, through either physical or mental rotation to the upright.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationSpatial Processing in Navigation, Imagery and Perception
    PublisherSpringer, Springer Nature
    Pages163-181
    Number of pages19
    ISBN (Electronic)9780387719788
    ISBN (Print)9780387719771
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Keywords

    • agnosias
    • face perception
    • mental rotation
    • mirror-image discrimination
    • object recognition
    • pattern recognition
    • what vs. where systems

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Pigs in space<sup>1</sup>: How we recognize rotated objects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this