Planned organisational change management: Forward to the past? An exploratory literature review

David Rosenbaum, Elizabeth More, Peter Steane

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify the development of planned organisational change models (POCMs) since Lewin’s three-step model and to highlight key linkages between them.

Design/methodology/approach: A total of 13 commonly used POCMs were identified and connections with Lewin’s three-step framework and associated process attributes were made, reflecting the connections between these models and Lewin.

Findings: The findings show that first Lewin’s three-step model represents a framework for planned change; however, these steps could not be viewed in isolation of other interrelated processes, including action research, group dynamics, and force field analysis. These process steps underpin the iterative aspects of his model. Second, all 13 POCMs have clearly identified linkages to Lewin, suggesting that the ongoing development of POCMs is more of an exercise in developing ongoing procedural steps to support change within the existing framework of the three-step model.

Research limitations/implications: The authors recognise that the inclusion of additional POCMs would help strengthen linkages to Lewin. The findings from this paper refocus attention on the three-step model, suggesting its ongoing centrality in planned organisational change rather than it being dismissed as an historical approach from which more recently developed models have become more relevant.

Practical implications: This paper presents opportunities for organisational change management researchers to challenge their thinking with regard to the ongoing search for model refinement, and for practitioners in the design and structure of POCM.

Originality/value: An analysis of the ongoing relevance of Lewin and his linkage with modern POCMs assist in rationalising the broadening, and often confusing literature on change. This paper therefore not only contributes to filtering such literature, but also helps clarify the myriad of POCMs and their use.

LanguageEnglish
Pages286-303
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Organizational Change Management
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Organizational change management
Literature review
Organizational change
Value engineering
Linkage
Design methodology
Isolation
Group dynamics
Centrality
Inclusion
Exercise

Bibliographical note

Australian Nonprofit Organisations

Keywords

  • Change models
  • Evolution of change
  • Lewin change model
  • Planned organisational change

Cite this

Rosenbaum, David ; More, Elizabeth ; Steane, Peter. / Planned organisational change management : Forward to the past? An exploratory literature review. In: Journal of Organizational Change Management. 2018 ; Vol. 31, No. 2. pp. 286-303.
@article{297445e8095c458ca0ec6b1fb7bb555a,
title = "Planned organisational change management: Forward to the past? An exploratory literature review",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify the development of planned organisational change models (POCMs) since Lewin’s three-step model and to highlight key linkages between them.Design/methodology/approach: A total of 13 commonly used POCMs were identified and connections with Lewin’s three-step framework and associated process attributes were made, reflecting the connections between these models and Lewin.Findings: The findings show that first Lewin’s three-step model represents a framework for planned change; however, these steps could not be viewed in isolation of other interrelated processes, including action research, group dynamics, and force field analysis. These process steps underpin the iterative aspects of his model. Second, all 13 POCMs have clearly identified linkages to Lewin, suggesting that the ongoing development of POCMs is more of an exercise in developing ongoing procedural steps to support change within the existing framework of the three-step model.Research limitations/implications: The authors recognise that the inclusion of additional POCMs would help strengthen linkages to Lewin. The findings from this paper refocus attention on the three-step model, suggesting its ongoing centrality in planned organisational change rather than it being dismissed as an historical approach from which more recently developed models have become more relevant.Practical implications: This paper presents opportunities for organisational change management researchers to challenge their thinking with regard to the ongoing search for model refinement, and for practitioners in the design and structure of POCM.Originality/value: An analysis of the ongoing relevance of Lewin and his linkage with modern POCMs assist in rationalising the broadening, and often confusing literature on change. This paper therefore not only contributes to filtering such literature, but also helps clarify the myriad of POCMs and their use.",
keywords = "Change models, Evolution of change, Lewin change model, Planned organisational change",
author = "David Rosenbaum and Elizabeth More and Peter Steane",
note = "Australian Nonprofit Organisations",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/JOCM-06-2015-0089",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "286--303",
journal = "Journal of Organizational Change Management",
issn = "0953-4814",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "2",

}

Planned organisational change management : Forward to the past? An exploratory literature review. / Rosenbaum, David; More, Elizabeth; Steane, Peter.

In: Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 31, No. 2, 01.01.2018, p. 286-303.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Planned organisational change management

T2 - Journal of Organizational Change Management

AU - Rosenbaum, David

AU - More, Elizabeth

AU - Steane, Peter

N1 - Australian Nonprofit Organisations

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify the development of planned organisational change models (POCMs) since Lewin’s three-step model and to highlight key linkages between them.Design/methodology/approach: A total of 13 commonly used POCMs were identified and connections with Lewin’s three-step framework and associated process attributes were made, reflecting the connections between these models and Lewin.Findings: The findings show that first Lewin’s three-step model represents a framework for planned change; however, these steps could not be viewed in isolation of other interrelated processes, including action research, group dynamics, and force field analysis. These process steps underpin the iterative aspects of his model. Second, all 13 POCMs have clearly identified linkages to Lewin, suggesting that the ongoing development of POCMs is more of an exercise in developing ongoing procedural steps to support change within the existing framework of the three-step model.Research limitations/implications: The authors recognise that the inclusion of additional POCMs would help strengthen linkages to Lewin. The findings from this paper refocus attention on the three-step model, suggesting its ongoing centrality in planned organisational change rather than it being dismissed as an historical approach from which more recently developed models have become more relevant.Practical implications: This paper presents opportunities for organisational change management researchers to challenge their thinking with regard to the ongoing search for model refinement, and for practitioners in the design and structure of POCM.Originality/value: An analysis of the ongoing relevance of Lewin and his linkage with modern POCMs assist in rationalising the broadening, and often confusing literature on change. This paper therefore not only contributes to filtering such literature, but also helps clarify the myriad of POCMs and their use.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify the development of planned organisational change models (POCMs) since Lewin’s three-step model and to highlight key linkages between them.Design/methodology/approach: A total of 13 commonly used POCMs were identified and connections with Lewin’s three-step framework and associated process attributes were made, reflecting the connections between these models and Lewin.Findings: The findings show that first Lewin’s three-step model represents a framework for planned change; however, these steps could not be viewed in isolation of other interrelated processes, including action research, group dynamics, and force field analysis. These process steps underpin the iterative aspects of his model. Second, all 13 POCMs have clearly identified linkages to Lewin, suggesting that the ongoing development of POCMs is more of an exercise in developing ongoing procedural steps to support change within the existing framework of the three-step model.Research limitations/implications: The authors recognise that the inclusion of additional POCMs would help strengthen linkages to Lewin. The findings from this paper refocus attention on the three-step model, suggesting its ongoing centrality in planned organisational change rather than it being dismissed as an historical approach from which more recently developed models have become more relevant.Practical implications: This paper presents opportunities for organisational change management researchers to challenge their thinking with regard to the ongoing search for model refinement, and for practitioners in the design and structure of POCM.Originality/value: An analysis of the ongoing relevance of Lewin and his linkage with modern POCMs assist in rationalising the broadening, and often confusing literature on change. This paper therefore not only contributes to filtering such literature, but also helps clarify the myriad of POCMs and their use.

KW - Change models

KW - Evolution of change

KW - Lewin change model

KW - Planned organisational change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044215893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JOCM-06-2015-0089

DO - 10.1108/JOCM-06-2015-0089

M3 - Review article

VL - 31

SP - 286

EP - 303

JO - Journal of Organizational Change Management

JF - Journal of Organizational Change Management

SN - 0953-4814

IS - 2

ER -