TY - JOUR
T1 - Platelet-rich plasma and treatment of erectile dysfunction
T2 - critical review of literature and global trends in platelet-rich plasma clinics
AU - Scott, Susan
AU - Roberts, Matthew
AU - Chung, Eric
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have recently been marketed as a form of autologous cell therapy under the banner of regenerative medicine despite limited scientific evidence on its use for treating erectile dysfunction (ED). Aim: To evaluate the evidence on PRP treatment for ED and determine the current trends in provision of this treatment. Methods: A critical review of the literature on PRP using the PubMed and Embase databases. Outcomes: This narrative review focuses on the clinical use of, regulation of, and evidence for PRP in the treatment of ED. Results: There is a limited number of published peer-reviewed articles demonstrating clinical outcomes pertaining to the use of PRP for ED in human. The technique of PRP application for ED is currently patented, with a global total of 683 registered clinics. The majority of PRP clinics do not provide cost estimates on their websites. Conclusion: Despite a global presence of PRP clinics and ongoing active marketing and public interest in regenerative medicine, no scientific evidence has been published to establish an evidence-based risk-benefit profile for PRP use for ED in humans. Given the limited data on clinical efficacy and potential harmful side effects, there is a need for a proper clinical trial to examine the role of PRP before it is accepted as standard of care in treatment for ED.
AB - Background: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have recently been marketed as a form of autologous cell therapy under the banner of regenerative medicine despite limited scientific evidence on its use for treating erectile dysfunction (ED). Aim: To evaluate the evidence on PRP treatment for ED and determine the current trends in provision of this treatment. Methods: A critical review of the literature on PRP using the PubMed and Embase databases. Outcomes: This narrative review focuses on the clinical use of, regulation of, and evidence for PRP in the treatment of ED. Results: There is a limited number of published peer-reviewed articles demonstrating clinical outcomes pertaining to the use of PRP for ED in human. The technique of PRP application for ED is currently patented, with a global total of 683 registered clinics. The majority of PRP clinics do not provide cost estimates on their websites. Conclusion: Despite a global presence of PRP clinics and ongoing active marketing and public interest in regenerative medicine, no scientific evidence has been published to establish an evidence-based risk-benefit profile for PRP use for ED in humans. Given the limited data on clinical efficacy and potential harmful side effects, there is a need for a proper clinical trial to examine the role of PRP before it is accepted as standard of care in treatment for ED.
KW - Autologous blood
KW - Erectile dysfunction
KW - Growth factors
KW - Platelet-rich plasma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062221284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.12.006
DO - 10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.12.006
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30833169
AN - SCOPUS:85062221284
SN - 2050-0513
VL - 7
SP - 306
EP - 312
JO - Sexual Medicine Reviews
JF - Sexual Medicine Reviews
IS - 2
ER -