Political disagreement, moral misinformation, and affective polarization

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

The present chapter introduces the notion of moral misinformation and explores its implications in the context of affective polarization. We argue that both phenomena involve representing political adversaries as moral antagonists, spurring animosity and distrust among partisans, and escalating political disagreements from ideological disputes to more entrenched and less easily reconcilable forms of resentment. We conclude by highlighting the role of trust in bridging the political divide and outline a number of strategies for cultivating cooperation across party lines.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Routledge handbook of philosophy of disagreement
EditorsMaria Baghramian, J. Adam Carter, Rach Cosker-Rowland
Place of PublicationLondon ; New York
PublisherRoutledge, Taylor and Francis Group
Chapter36
Pages444-456
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9781040151105, 9781003154471
ISBN (Print)9780367723484, 9780367723545
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Cite this