Population genetics informs the management of a controversial Australian waterbird

Skye Davis*, Kate J. Brandis, Adam J. Stow

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)
    27 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Widespread degradation across Australia’s inland wetland network has contributed to severe declines for many waterbird species. In contrast, breeding colonies of the Australian white ibis (Threskiornis molucca) have increased in urbanised areas along the coast, but the level of dispersal and gene flow between inland and coastal areas remain unknown. This study uses single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to ascertain the variables influencing genetic connectivity among several inland and urban colonies of white ibis across south-eastern Australia between 2015 and 2018. The contemporary effective population size was estimated, and this value was used in simulations to evaluate the impact of various management scenarios on future genetic diversity. We found no significant differences in allele frequencies between localities, or robust evidence of site fidelity, therefore suggesting widespread dispersal and gene flow between inland and urban colonies. Furthermore, effective sizes were large enough to maintain genetic diversity into the future under various realistic management scenarios. However, the lack of genetic partitioning found suggests that urban management of the ibis should not be undertaken in isolation of the conservation requirements of inland colonies.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1023-1034
    Number of pages12
    JournalConservation Genetics
    Volume22
    Issue number6
    Early online date21 Aug 2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2021

    Keywords

    • Australian white ibis
    • Effective population size
    • Population genetics
    • Urbanisation
    • Waterbird conservation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Population genetics informs the management of a controversial Australian waterbird'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this