Post-common envelope PN, fundamental or irrelevant?

Orsola De Marco, T. Reichardt, R. Iaconi, T. Hillwig, G. H. Jacoby, D. Keller, R. G. Izzard, J. Nordhaus, E. G. Blackman

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding contributionpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    One in 5 PN are ejected from common envelope binary interactions but Kepler results are already showing this proportion to be larger. Their properties, such as abundances can be starkly different from those of the general population, so they should be considered separately when using PN as chemical or population probes. Unfortunately post-common envelope PN cannot be discerned using only their morphologies, but this will change once we couple our new common envelope simulations with PN formation models.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationPlanetary nebulae : multi-wavelength probes of stellar and galactic evolution
    Subtitle of host publicationproceedings of the 323rd symposium of the International Astronomical Union held in Beijing, China October 10-14, 2016
    EditorsXiaowei Liu, Letizia Stanghellini, Amanda Karakas
    Place of PublicationCambridge
    PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
    Pages213-217
    Number of pages5
    ISBN (Print)9781107169913
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017
    Event323rd symposium of the International Astronomical Union - Beijing, China
    Duration: 10 Oct 201614 Oct 2016

    Publication series

    NameIAU symposium
    PublisherCambridge University Press
    Number323
    ISSN (Print)1743-9213

    Conference

    Conference323rd symposium of the International Astronomical Union
    Country/TerritoryChina
    CityBeijing
    Period10/10/1614/10/16

    Keywords

    • binaries (including multiple): close
    • hydrodynamics
    • planetary nebulae: general
    • stars: AGB and post-AGB
    • stars: evolution
    • stars: statistics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Post-common envelope PN, fundamental or irrelevant?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this