Power, ideology, politics and the revolutionary subject

Govand Khalid Azeez, Alejandra Gaitán-Barrera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The synthesis of different modalities of power and ideological frameworks has ensured an overpowering and suffocating interpellation of the subject. The state apparatus in conjunction with the capitalist dispositif dictates not only the ontological realities of the subject but also its social destiny, its subjective capabilities and degree of appearance in the world. In this paper, we examine and revisit Louis Althusser’s dual mode of politico-ontological subjectivity: the Good-Subject and the bad-subject. The former is the interpellated human-animal of the world of domestication which through erasing or denying revolutionary-truth comes to conceive politics merely as the art of being governed. This Good-Subject conceives political subjectivity as either an endeavour to return to an authentic originary past, an ad hominem identitarian logicality, or at best the amendment of the existing configuration of the system. On the other hand, the bad-subject is one that is obsessed with the question of how not to be governed by the existing capitalo-statist logic and order. We argue here that the bad-subject is a generic subjective-operator consisting of a set of critical procedures, radical ethos and praxical political steps that introduce a novel revolutionary-truth into the structured hierarchized capitalo-statist world.

LanguageEnglish
Pages501-518
Number of pages18
JournalCritique
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Ideology
Revolution
Ontological
Political Subjectivity
Operator
Interpellation
Subjectivity
Ethos
Modality
Dispositif
Destiny
Logic
Ad Hominem
Animals
Domestication
Louis Althusser

Keywords

  • Capitalism
  • Ideology
  • Power
  • Resistance
  • State
  • Subject

Cite this

Azeez, Govand Khalid ; Gaitán-Barrera, Alejandra. / Power, ideology, politics and the revolutionary subject. In: Critique. 2017 ; Vol. 45, No. 4. pp. 501-518.
@article{72653d4458d3433db13f24b0ecff98a1,
title = "Power, ideology, politics and the revolutionary subject",
abstract = "The synthesis of different modalities of power and ideological frameworks has ensured an overpowering and suffocating interpellation of the subject. The state apparatus in conjunction with the capitalist dispositif dictates not only the ontological realities of the subject but also its social destiny, its subjective capabilities and degree of appearance in the world. In this paper, we examine and revisit Louis Althusser’s dual mode of politico-ontological subjectivity: the Good-Subject and the bad-subject. The former is the interpellated human-animal of the world of domestication which through erasing or denying revolutionary-truth comes to conceive politics merely as the art of being governed. This Good-Subject conceives political subjectivity as either an endeavour to return to an authentic originary past, an ad hominem identitarian logicality, or at best the amendment of the existing configuration of the system. On the other hand, the bad-subject is one that is obsessed with the question of how not to be governed by the existing capitalo-statist logic and order. We argue here that the bad-subject is a generic subjective-operator consisting of a set of critical procedures, radical ethos and praxical political steps that introduce a novel revolutionary-truth into the structured hierarchized capitalo-statist world.",
keywords = "Capitalism, Ideology, Power, Resistance, State, Subject",
author = "Azeez, {Govand Khalid} and Alejandra Gait{\'a}n-Barrera",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/03017605.2017.1377928",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "501--518",
journal = "Critique",
issn = "0301-7605",
publisher = "Critique",
number = "4",

}

Power, ideology, politics and the revolutionary subject. / Azeez, Govand Khalid; Gaitán-Barrera, Alejandra.

In: Critique, Vol. 45, No. 4, 02.10.2017, p. 501-518.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power, ideology, politics and the revolutionary subject

AU - Azeez, Govand Khalid

AU - Gaitán-Barrera, Alejandra

PY - 2017/10/2

Y1 - 2017/10/2

N2 - The synthesis of different modalities of power and ideological frameworks has ensured an overpowering and suffocating interpellation of the subject. The state apparatus in conjunction with the capitalist dispositif dictates not only the ontological realities of the subject but also its social destiny, its subjective capabilities and degree of appearance in the world. In this paper, we examine and revisit Louis Althusser’s dual mode of politico-ontological subjectivity: the Good-Subject and the bad-subject. The former is the interpellated human-animal of the world of domestication which through erasing or denying revolutionary-truth comes to conceive politics merely as the art of being governed. This Good-Subject conceives political subjectivity as either an endeavour to return to an authentic originary past, an ad hominem identitarian logicality, or at best the amendment of the existing configuration of the system. On the other hand, the bad-subject is one that is obsessed with the question of how not to be governed by the existing capitalo-statist logic and order. We argue here that the bad-subject is a generic subjective-operator consisting of a set of critical procedures, radical ethos and praxical political steps that introduce a novel revolutionary-truth into the structured hierarchized capitalo-statist world.

AB - The synthesis of different modalities of power and ideological frameworks has ensured an overpowering and suffocating interpellation of the subject. The state apparatus in conjunction with the capitalist dispositif dictates not only the ontological realities of the subject but also its social destiny, its subjective capabilities and degree of appearance in the world. In this paper, we examine and revisit Louis Althusser’s dual mode of politico-ontological subjectivity: the Good-Subject and the bad-subject. The former is the interpellated human-animal of the world of domestication which through erasing or denying revolutionary-truth comes to conceive politics merely as the art of being governed. This Good-Subject conceives political subjectivity as either an endeavour to return to an authentic originary past, an ad hominem identitarian logicality, or at best the amendment of the existing configuration of the system. On the other hand, the bad-subject is one that is obsessed with the question of how not to be governed by the existing capitalo-statist logic and order. We argue here that the bad-subject is a generic subjective-operator consisting of a set of critical procedures, radical ethos and praxical political steps that introduce a novel revolutionary-truth into the structured hierarchized capitalo-statist world.

KW - Capitalism

KW - Ideology

KW - Power

KW - Resistance

KW - State

KW - Subject

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033558011&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03017605.2017.1377928

DO - 10.1080/03017605.2017.1377928

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 501

EP - 518

JO - Critique

T2 - Critique

JF - Critique

SN - 0301-7605

IS - 4

ER -